x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.

The Property Ombudsman has revealed that his redress scheme has supported 69 per cent of consumer complaints lodged against letting agents in a three month period.

TPO is the largest of three government-approved redress schemes and claims to have more than 85 per cent of UK letting agents registered.

In the three months since October 1, from which date letting agents were obliged to be in one of the redress schemes, 2,246 tenants and landlords contacted TPO with disputes concerning rental deposits, lettings fees, property viewings, rent collection, tenancy agreements, inventories and reference checks.

TPO's breakdown of its contacts over the final quarter of the year is as follows:

- 2,246 lettings enquiries (which represented 57 per cent of the 3,962 enquiries raised overall, covering lettings, sales and other property disputes);

- 64 per cent (1,444) of enquiries were raised by tenants, while 36 per cent (802) were made by landlords requesting TPO's dispute resolution service;

- 368 formal lettings complaints (which represented 57 per cent of the 644 property complaints reviewed by TPO, covering lettings, sales and other property disputes)

- 69 per cent of lettings complaints investigated were supported by the Ombudsman.

The core of the issues raised by tenants and landlords were:

- communication failure (23 per cent)

- repairs and maintenance including inventories (16 per cent)

- deposit handling, including holding deposits (12 per cent)

- rent (nine per cent)

- duty of care, such as failure to meet contract pre-conditions (nine per cent).

Comments

  • icon

    If you think going to court would alter the outcome you might be disappointed; also the time it takes to get a court hearing is not too quick either.

    • 26 February 2015 15:22 PM
  • icon

    Yes but in a complaint I had a decision on late January 2015 the papers were submitted mid May 2014. TPO took 7 months to put it in front of a Case officer. Needless to say they then dealt with it - all 150+ pages of evidence - within a month including going to the agent with their decision and getting an acceptance of the award they made back from them.

    In other words they did not read the blindingly obvious evidence indicating this agent was a complete shambles.

    They just did not consider the evidence, I would never use a redress Scheme again, if you have a strong case on a valid complaint far better to go Civil Court.

    Incidentally they may support 69% of complaints and uphold them but that, as in my case, does not mean the whole complaint. They may just slap the agent's wrist for one 'minor' offence as part of the total claim

    • 24 February 2015 13:38 PM
MovePal MovePal MovePal