Landlords fear Newham example will be copied elsewhere
Thursday 28th June 2012
The decision by the London Borough of Newham to press ahead with blanket licensing for every single private landlord has come under fire, amid concerns that councils across the UK could follow suit.
Newham will be licensing some 35,000 rental households, using selective licensing powers. Landlords who are not licensed where they are required to be will not be able to use S21 notices, and could face fines of up to £20,000.
David Salusbury, chairman of the National Landlords Association, said: “It is deeply disappointing that the London Borough of Newham has taken the decision to license all landlords in its area.
“The NLA realises that there are significant issues present in Newham, which the council is right to want to address.
“But selective licensing of landlords is designed to address distinct problems relating to housing management by targeting specific areas. Newham’s blanket approach goes beyond the intention of the legislation and has not gained the support of local landlords.
“Newham Council has provided no solid evidence to support their argument that such drastic proposals will have the impact it expects.
“Indeed, they will only increase the burdens on those who already comply with the law, without having any bearing on those who blatantly ignore it. The NLA offered an alternative strategy which would have enabled the council to focus their resources squarely on the rogue operators.
“This decision has wider implications for the supply side of the private rented-sector. The NLA will be consulting with other stakeholders to assess the potential impact and how best to respond as an industry.”
(15) Comments | Report Abuse
| |
@ dave
looking on the bright side, if that does happen we won't have to listen to your doom mongering anymore |
| | your landlords are going to be so distressed as prices fall 30-50%,that you are gonna wish you never opened in the first place |
| | I think if any of us had 1in 4 problem tenants we'd just shut up shop, it would be more trouble than its worth. It needs a sizeable group of private landlords to get together to fight it for anything to happen; to demand to see the evidence that their tenants are the issue. |
| |
Only dodgy people hear are the council, took on 4 bond scheme tenants, 1 months rent and the deposit is locked in a bond.
When the tenant moved out, we showed the council the damage and inventory they told us basically get stuffed and the landlord lost out They have done this to many landlords and agents avoid the bond scheme or ask for the rent to be paid and deposit to be in protection account! |
| |
We manage over 3000 properties across London and the SE and including Newham.
1 in 4 antisocial tenants would cause me problems. I really dont believe our problem tenants exceed 4 (excluding late payers and those who moan about everything). They don't beat wives, they don't have dogs - they are young and have too many friends staying and some loud parties. The figures from Newham are unrecognisable to any agent I have ever met. |
| |
Selective Licensing can only brought in areas of :-
(i) Low Housing Demand and/or (ii) There is a persistent significant problem associated with Anti-Social Behaviour in or near the vicinity of privately rented property. Newham is a popular area to live (certainly for renting), so not an area of low housing demand (e.g. boarded up homes). Newham claims that private renting is a major cause of anti-social behaviour, but has failed to provide evidence. They allege 25% of ASB is linked to properties in the PRS. So, in other words 1 in 4 private tenants in some way is involed in crime! Newham have failed to provide data for ASB linked to Housing Association. Why is that??? Newham have have provided a definition of Anti-Social Behaviour, but say it includes 'dog fowling' and 'wife-beating' in their figures. I am not sure, how Newham officers can tell a piece of dog turd came from a Privatly Rented home. This is surprising as Newham say they don't have any figures for ASB from Housing Association. |
| |
Newham Counci trialed Selective Licensing in Little Ilford neighbourhood improvement.
In their trial Newham, it took them 18months to track down all the Landlords, which consisted of 7 residential streets. Newham claim the pilot was a huge sucess. Perhaps, sucess in their mind, is they collectd £79,000 in fees. None of the landlords of the scheme, felt any benefit or improvement in the area. Some tenants, were not happy, as the council staff spent a long time inspecting their home and felt process was quite intrusive. |
| |
It is regrettable Newham Council has waged a propaganda war against Landlords.
Newham Council is only interested in the Licensing fee. It is determined to destroy the reputation of Landlords in order to justify its policy of blanket licensing. Newham says Licensing will tackle rogue landlords, but it is the wrong tool for the job; The only people who will apply for licensing, will be the good Landlords who will have to bear the burden of red tape and regulation. It is a tax on good landlords. During the consultation Landlords asked Newham time and time again - Once all the good Landlords have been licensed, how will you find the bad landlords?. Why can't Newham go after bad Landlords and deal with any issues directly? |
| | If Boris brings in his planned London wide scheme, Newhams will be consigned to histrory |
| |
oh dear landlords face regulation and a level playing field
btl landlords now face 1/tight regulation 2/falling houseprices 3/rising interest rates 4/rising unemplyment 5/ benefit caps 6/rising tenancy gaps |
| |
I think Sir Robin is a genius who should be applauded for his vision and foresight.
Wibble Love Ken |
| |
In Sir Robins promises to the locals, housing comes in at No 20 - below improving play areas, every child a musician, free swimming for children, and free bulky waste collection.
His promise No 20 is: Some of the worst housing in the borough can be found in the private rented sector which now provides homes for a third of our households. We want to be tough on the minority of rogue landlords who rent out sub standard accommodation. To help improve private rented housing we will, subject to consultation, be introducing a compulsory registration scheme. This will help us to recognise responsible landlords and tackle the minority who do not look after their properties. We will also be exploring ways that the Council can acquire and provide high quality homes as a private rented landlord. Then, promise 21: We want to reward aspiration and extend the housing ladder to help people to buy a home in Newham, so that they can have security and improve their own opportunities. We will establish a Council financed shared equity scheme to assist households unable to afford outright homeownership into affordable home ownership, initially starting to help at least 150 households. Mmmm. Is it cynical to think that with Landlords miffed with interference selling up and investing elsewhere, prices may work in his favour? |
| |
A little background....
Robin Wales currently serves on the Boards of the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (LOCOG) for which he earned £8,000 in 2008/09 and £7,000 in 2009/10 as a non executive director He as involved in a bitter battle with the Friends of Queens Market which represents the market traders at Queen's Market. The traders and residents were objecting to plans to demolish the market and replace it with a new market hall with 164 stalls and 6,374m2 of shop units, 350 homes, a new civic building and a library. In May 2009, Mayor of London Boris Johnson overruled Sir Robin Wales' decision to build the 31 storey tower. Wales has attracted further controversy by being awarded a 4% pay rise taking his salary to £80,029, at a time when government has called for public sector wage restraints and job losses and pay freezes at Newham Council. Wales publicly stated that he would be giving the whole of his pay rise to charity. However, Wales' pay has increased 40 per cent from £58,500 since 2002. It has also been reported that Wales will refuse to work alongside the first democratically-elected Mayor of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman. As Mayor, Wales' Newham Council have come under heavy criticism for their £111m project to relocate council offices in a single Newham Dockside block, including £18.7m of design and refurbishment costs. An investigation by the BBC found this to include at least 5 items of designer lighting each costing over £1,800. Revelations have angered local residents in what continues to be one of the poorest boroughs on the UK. |
| | Next, expect to see rent controls. This is a precursor to communist state controlled housing. Every tenancy monitored and data sold on to other Govt bodies is a given. Next they will dictate who can rent to and shout 'discrimination' where a Landlord declines a housing benefit tenant for fear of the draconian manner in which such lets are dealt with by the LA's housing office which never supports a landlord. |
| |
I agree. Their consultation document was farcical. The only agent they approached was probably the smallest agent in the whole borough!
Make no mistake - this licensing scheme is for the benefit of the Council and the Council alone. It will impose additional expense for good landlords and drive the rogue elements further underground. With Boris looking at London wide licensing in a more sensible way, this scheme offers little more than revenue and headlines for Robin Wales and his lefty cohorts. As has been said before, they need to encourage developers to build new homes which will be better quality more efficient. They need to relax their onerous s106 requirements and bring investment - not deter the mass of landbanks from being developed. |
DISCLAIMER:The views contained in these user comments are not endorsed by Letting Agent Today(nor its associates and advertisers) in any way and are provided by users who wish to publish their independent opinions on our news.Whilst every effort is made to moderate these comments,due to the instant nature of the posting not all offensive material can be removed instantly.Please help us keep the comments areas tidy by reporting details of any infringements to team@lettingagenttoday.co.uk
Editorial Contact Details - Rosalind Renshaw
rosalind.renshaw@gmail.com
New agent-owned portal is planned by top names in industry
More competition in tenancy deposit schemes welcomed by minister
Immigrant checks would be 'light touch', Prisk promises







Newsletter Sign Up
