Government must respond to 10,000-signature online petition

Government must respond to 10,000-signature online petition


Todays other news
It's applied to the social housing sector for a year...
In total, three agencies have been kicked out of the...
The company also encourages tenants to bring in pets...
The event takes place next July...


An online petition demanding the reinstatement of buy to let landlords’ tax breaks has broken the 10,000 signatures mark which means the government has to make a formal response.

Advertisement

The petition, which is entitled ‘Reverse the planned tax relief restriction on individual landlords’, was set up London-based landlord Ruhal Uddin and looked for some days last week as if it may not secure the required 10,000 supporters.

Advertisement

It is the latest industry argument against the announcement last month that tax relief mortgage interest payments and arrangement fees incurred when taking out buy to let mortgages would be restricted to the basic rate of income tax, currently 20 per cent – even if the individual landlord was liable for the payment of higher levels of income tax.

Advertisement

The government is now expected to set out its arguments against the petition – and for the continuation of its Budget announcement – in the next few weeks.

If the petition goes on to receive 100,000 signatures before the deadline of January 26, it may trigger a parliamentary debate – although this is not guaranteed.

Advertisement

The online petition – which you can see here – states: 

“We operate as sole traders and incur costs in the course of running our business. The planned restriction will unfairly target us by preventing us from offsetting costs in the same manner as other sole traders. 

Advertisement

“We ask that the planned restriction be reconsidered as it has unfair implications.

“The Institute for Fiscal Studies has stated, in response to the Budget, that individual landlords are already taxed more heavily than other homeowners.

“The private sector is heavily reliant on individual landlords. The planned change is likely to result in higher rents due to landlords looking to offset higher tax liabilities.

“In some cases, employed individuals own buy to let properties as investments for retirement. The planned restriction would adversely and unfairly affect them.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Hands forming a heart shape against a bright sky, symbolising community and care in property letting.
It's applied to the social housing sector for a year...
House key attached to a house-shaped keychain on wooden surface.
The company also encourages tenants to bring in pets...
For rent sign in front of a blurred house, real estate rental advertisement.
Letting agent reviewing property details on a laptop in an office setting.
The mandatory qualifications were proposed at Labour's conference last week...
Landlords are selling up and rents are rising as a...
This is apparent in the prime lettings segment, it's claimed...
The fine was slightly reduced in return for rapid payment...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
It's applied to the social housing sector for a year...
In total, three agencies have been kicked out of the...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.