Government rules out any re-think on restricting buy to let tax breaks

Government rules out any re-think on restricting buy to let tax breaks


Todays other news
Propertymark worry over Renters Rights Act and agent websites...
The growth follows the relaunch of the lettings division two...
The independently owned firms collectively manage over 2,000 residential properties...
The two companies have worked together since 2021....


The government is ruling out any re-think on its proposals to reduce buy to let tax breaks from next year.

The Financial Secretary to the Treasury, David Gauke, has written to the Residential Landlords’ Association to emphasise the determination of the government to plough ahead with the changes, first announced in July by Chancellor George Osborne.

Gauke’s letter is uncompromising, saying the Osborne proposals are essential to establish “a fair tax system”.

Gauke’s letter says: “By restricting cost relief to the basic rate of income tax, all finance costs incurred by individual landlords will be treated the same by the tax system.”

The RLA, in an earlier letter to Gauke, had made the point that the private rental sector should be treated like any other business for tax purposes. 

Gauke’s response to this point includes this key statement: “Landlords will continue to get full income tax relief on the costs incurred in letting out a property, such as letting agency fees and replacing furniture, as others do on the costs they incur in carrying out a trade. Finance costs are different as having a mortgage on a property also allows the landlord to purchase a more expensive property and incur larger gains on the investment than they would without the mortgage. The government wants to rebalance relief for these finance costs and ensure that all individual landlords get finance cost relief at the same rate.”

Gauke insists that the phased reduction on tax relief for landlords will not lead to a rise in rents “due to the small overall proportion of the housing market affected.” 

The minister insists only one in five landlords will pay more tax as a result of the change, which will be phased in over four years.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Industry welcomes Gove as new Housing Secretary
Even many tenants are unaware of the Act's provisions...
Thie change is a bid to create a more consistent...
Private rental property conditions and enforcement slammed by MPs
King’s Speech to contain leasehold and building safety measures...
Rental yields up to 7.8% in parts of capital city
Yields ‘sitting pretty’ despite Renters Rights Act woe...
LRG - the former Leaders Romans Group - is issuing...
The sheet must be given to tenants by May 31...
And on top of those three, there are further reforms...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Propertymark worry over Renters Rights Act and agent websites...
The growth follows the relaunch of the lettings division two...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.