Tax body highlights ‘complexity and confusion’ of buy to let tax change

Tax body highlights ‘complexity and confusion’ of buy to let tax change


Todays other news


While almost every lettings organisation has been up in arms at the raft of tax changes for landlords suggested by Chancellor George Osborne, he has at least one ally – perhaps predictably, it is the Association of Taxation Technicians.

But while the group says it supports the planned replacement of wear and tear allowance with tax relief on the cost of replacing furnishings, it still has at least one concern over one detailed part of Osborne’s reform.

From April 2016, Osborne’s proposal is that the wear and tear allowance will be replaced with a relief that enables landlords of homes to let to deduct the costs they actually incur on replacing furnishings in the property. The intention – says Osbrone – is that it will lead to more consistency and fairness in the taxation of residential property businesses.

“Under the current system, which was introduced in 2013, tax relief is only available on residential lettings which have been let fully furnished and it can, at times, be tricky for landlords to ascertain whether the furniture provided results in a property being considered fully or only partly furnished. This proposed new method of tax relief will see this problem disappear” says Paul Hill, chairman of the ATT’s Technical Steering Group. 

However, even the ATT – which is a charitable body and describes itself as “the leading professional body for those providing UK tax compliance services” – has concern about HMRC’s proposal to exclude the cost of any ‘improvement element’ of the replacement asset from the amount that can attract tax relief.  

“This part of the proposals has the potential to lead to complexity and confusion and landlords will be looking to HMRC for detailed guidance on how the improvement rule should be applied” says Hill. 

Technological changes in items like white electrical goods mean that a replacement appliance with increased functionality may actually be cheaper than the old appliance or that a like-for-like replacement is simply unavailable. 

Hill says clear guidance is needed on how the new rules will apply in such situations and that guidance will need to be kept up-to-date. 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The Bank of England monetary policy committee meets tomorrow morning...
The intention is to create a safety net for individuals...
A Green Party politician has accused landlords of wanting to...
The shift to limited company ownership dates back to 2016...
The Welsh Government is backing the call for a 'compensation'...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
A consultation document is being released today....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Propertymark responds to the government announcement...
The partnership is with due diligence platform Thirdfort....
The advice comes from Propertymark...
Sponsored Content
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...
Tenants want a place they can call home—somewhere comfortable, safe,...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here