Top accountancy body slams Osborne’s “unthought-through” BTL tax plans

Top accountancy body slams Osborne’s “unthought-through” BTL tax plans


Todays other news
A reversal of remote working as well as attempts to...
John D Wood & Co has appointed a new lettings...
The Lettings Hub has launched a new product to help...
Proptech supplier Property Sense is looking to raise £1m in...


“Unthought-through”, “unfair and unreasonable” and leading to “extreme confusion” – those are the thoughts of Britain’s leading professional accounting body on George Osborne’s proposed buy to let tax changes.

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales, speaking to the Daily Telegraph, has slammed the Chancellor’s controversial new tax on buy-to-let tax as “unfair and unreasonable” saying it will force some landlords out of business, distort the private rental sector and make life harder for young potential buyers. 

Osborne announced in July that from 2017 he would be clamping down on buy to let landlords by removing the right to claim more than the basic rate tax equivalent in relief for mortgage interest. He is also tightening the rules about claiming for wear and tear by allowing claims only for money spent rather than the annual 10 per cent of rental that’s currently allowed automatically.

The measure is included in the Finance Bill now going through Parliament. The ICAEW has told the Telegraph that Osborne’s professed bid – to create a more level playing field between property investors and owner-occupiers – will actually disproportionately hit small property investors, who include middle-class savers adding one or two buy to let properties to their pensions and other portfolios. 

“Large companies investing in residential property will not be affected – and will be able to continue claiming tax relief. Wealthy investors buying cash are also excluded” says the Telegraph article featuring the institute.

“Far from being level, it leaves the playing field with a cliff edge in the middle” says the ICAEW. 

“Taxpayers will have priced and borrowed according to the tax relief they expected, and these borrowing decisions would necessarily have a long timeline. Many will not be able to restructure their debt” it claims.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The Renters Rights Bill turns to the House of Lords...
Liam Monaghan is managing director of London Central Portfolio...
There are revenue streams to emerge from the Renters Rights...
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The removal of temporary rent controls may make buy-to-let more...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
A reversal of remote working as well as attempts to...
John D Wood & Co has appointed a new lettings...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here