Surprise as Shelter queries whether rent controls would really work

Surprise as Shelter queries whether rent controls would really work


Todays other news
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
It’s in London’s Notting Hill - following an existing branch...
The protest is by the London Renters Union...
Reapit has entered a partnership with HomeLet and Let Alliance...
A council wants to be able to seize properties empty...


The housing charity Shelter – which in recent years has been aggressively critical of letting agencies and landlords in the private rental sector – has shocked many onlookers by being critical of Labour’s policy of rent controls.

 

Jeremy Corbyn announced controls – at least for city areas – in his closing speech at this week’s Labour party conference

 

But Shelter has warned that this could indirectly “end up harming” the very tenants which Corbyn and his colleagues seek to protect. 

 

Shelter chief executive officer, Polly Neale, says: “Shelter supports controls that lengthen tenancies and protect families from unfair rent rises, but not old fashioned rent-setting which we think could end up harming the very people on low incomes they’re meant to help, if and when landlords sell their properties.”

 

The comment received sharp criticism from one Corbyn supporter, the former Channel 4 journalist Paul Mason – now a cheerleader for the Labour party – who went to Twitter to say: “Shelter’s attack on Labour’s rent cap proposal is unfortunate. I thought the organisation’s aim was to protect tenants and homeless.”

 

He continued: “Their repeated opposition to rent caps does not seem based on evidence but on neoliberal assumptions about market behaviour.”

 

Mason’s tweets appear now to have been deleted.

Meanwhile the rental sector professionals continue in their criticism of the Labour proposal. The National Landlords’ Association has branded it “economically illiterate” and says government intervention through rent controls would be counter-productive to encouraging supply at a time when it is so badly needed.

 

“Rent control, or the artificial suppression of rents, may also serve as a barrier to further investment in the stock of private rented properties if the rent generated is too low to allow the landlord to operate a proper maintenance regime without making a financial loss” it adds.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
Reapit has entered a partnership with HomeLet and Let Alliance...
A proptech lettings platform has warned there are more ‘unintended...
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The removal of temporary rent controls may make buy-to-let more...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
It’s in London’s Notting Hill - following an existing branch...
The protest is by the London Renters Union...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here