Opposition grows to threat of another stamp duty attack on buy to let

Opposition grows to threat of another stamp duty attack on buy to let


Todays other news
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
It’s in London’s Notting Hill - following an existing branch...
The protest is by the London Renters Union...
Reapit has entered a partnership with HomeLet and Let Alliance...
A council wants to be able to seize properties empty...


Opposition is growing fast to the threat of another stamp duty attack on the buy to let sector, rumoured to be part of government plans for the Autumn Budget in November. 

Yesterday we reported that influential political journalists in Conservative-supporting publications suggested that government insiders had advocated another stamp duty surcharge for buy to let investors was being considered by Chancellor Phillip Hammond for later this year.

In April 2016 his predecessor, George Osborne, introduced a three per cent surcharge on additional homes – holiday properties and buy to lets.

Now two former Conservative cabinet ministers have criticised reported plans for an increase in the surcharge. 

John Redwood, the former trade secretary, has told the Daily Telegraph: “There is no need to increase taxes and if you carry on increasing them you’ll collect less money from people, which is the opposite of what we want to achieve. The answer for the Treasury is cut stamp duty and you’ll raise more money.”

Lord Lilley, the former social security secretary, told the same newspaper: “The only two ways to get house prices down are to build more houses or to prevent people buying them, by putting taxes on them. They’ve opted for the second one. But we just need to build more houses. We’ve let four million extra people into the country and we haven’t built enough houses for the people who are already here.”

Meanwhile Keystone Property Finance chief executive David Whittaker warns: “A further hike in stamp duty aimed at the sector really would be the straw that broke the camel’s back and could result in landlords exiting the market in their droves. This would be disastrous for the country. It might peg house prices back a bit but it would hurt those in the rented sector more and could lead to an increase in homelessness.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Reapit has entered a partnership with HomeLet and Let Alliance...
The Renters Rights Bill turns to the House of Lords...
Liam Monaghan is managing director of London Central Portfolio...
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The removal of temporary rent controls may make buy-to-let more...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
It’s in London’s Notting Hill - following an existing branch...
The protest is by the London Renters Union...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here