A buy to let investor has been forced to close down two rat infested homes he owns in Rotherham after they were deemed unfit for people to live in.
He was ordered to close the properties after they were deemed unfit for occupation based on serious electrical and fire safety issues. They were also riddled with pests as well as having signs of rats – all of which fall foul of Rotherham Council’s strict selective licensing rules in the area.
The landlord, who has been served with a prohibition notice, will now have his licence revoked and face criminal charges.
A further two landlords have also been taken to task under the selective licensing scheme in the Eastwood area of Rotherham, after ignoring calls to fix boilers at two properties.
The council had to carry out emergency repair work after they left their tenants without heating and hot water. The landlords will now be charged for the repairs.
The council has also secured a conviction against yet another landlord after he failed to clean his garden despite repeated warnings to do so. Waseem Ali Yunus was ordered to pay a total of £1,019.21 in fines and costs at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court.
Landlord Basharat Hussain was also found guilty at Sheffield Magistrate’s Court of failing to licence two properties in Rotherham. He was ordered to pay more than £550 in fines and costs. One of the properties was in such a state that it was prohibited from use in March this year.
In addition, council officers also closed another property in Eastwood, after discovering the house had rats.
A council spokesman says: “Nobody should have to live in such appalling conditions, which is why we will seek to bring to justice those that force tenants to live in such miserable squalor. We are working hard to banish bad landlords, which is why we have our selective licensing scheme in an area like Eastwood.”
%20-%20IMAGE%20Client%20Accounting%20%E2%80%93%20what%20are%20your%20options.jpg)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
Agree with action taken against those properties ( although not sure of the extent " cleaning of garden " was required.
But one thing is certain - It doesn't require an expensive Licensing scheme for the council to take such action. !!!
yeah being charge around 600-700 per properties. no one had such high income compare to the Local authorities. they set their own pricing and who is regulating? with regards to garden, if house is let as a whole including gardens, its the tenants responsibilities to maintain it as it was given. why harrass the landlord knowing that it s against the tenancy? again the abuse of power!!!
Please login to comment