Agents offering let-only services ‘miss out on thousands in revenue’

Agents offering let-only services ‘miss out on thousands in revenue’


Todays other news
A reversal of remote working as well as attempts to...
John D Wood & Co has appointed a new lettings...
The Lettings Hub has launched a new product to help...
Proptech supplier Property Sense is looking to raise £1m in...


A research report claims letting agents could be missing out on thousands of pounds of potential income each year by not providing full property management to landlords. 

The report is from outsourced supplier ARPM which says that many agents in London typically offer let-only, but to their detriment – agents could increase their average annual income per tenancy by up to 80 per cent if they offered a full service.

The report says:

– the ban charging tenant fees will result in £400 less income on average per new let for London agents;

– longer tenancies mean there are fewer opportunities to earn income from let-only and tenant find services;

– let-only does not contribute  to a business’s capital valuation;

– focussing on full property management can increase average annual income per tenancy by up to 63 per cent in the capital and business valuation by 600 per cent;

– there is an untapped market of almost one million landlords who only use letting agents for tenant find services or do not use agents at all;

– private renting is now the most prevalent form of tenure in London and 36 per cent of landlords who invest in London buy-to-let property live outside of the capital.

Lettings expert and founder of propertychecklists.co.uk, Kate Faulkner, writes in the report: “The property market is changing, and while many letting agents may conclude that it’s not a great time for their business, I believe the opposite is true. What this report highlights is the great opportunity available in property management which can improve financials for agents, protect landlords and raise property standards for tenants.  

“Those who focus more on let-only could be missing out not only on the chance to grow their business but helping to deliver legally and safely let properties from landlords who lack the time and knowledge to do this themselves.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The Renters Rights Bill turns to the House of Lords...
Liam Monaghan is managing director of London Central Portfolio...
There are revenue streams to emerge from the Renters Rights...
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The removal of temporary rent controls may make buy-to-let more...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
A reversal of remote working as well as attempts to...
John D Wood & Co has appointed a new lettings...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here