Fine after improvement notice on rented home was partly ignored

Fine after improvement notice on rented home was partly ignored


Todays other news
The illegal eviction took place in February 2024....
UK letting agents must check tenants and landlords against official...
David Adams, managing director of Chester family agency Cavendish...
Rayner under pressure to show the Bill will help the...


A rented home in Mansfield was found to have serious health and safety hazards, including a leaking roof and a lack of smoke detectors, a court has been told.

In a case brought before Mansfield Magistrates by the town’s council, landlord Fiona Needham was convicted under the Housing Act 2004. 

She had previously pleaded not guilty to the allegation and was due to be tried on the matter, but changed her plea to guilty. 

She was fined £1,060 and ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £100 and full prosecution costs of £1,551.85. 

The court was told the landlord had failed to comply with an improvement notice issued by the council, whose officers inspected the property after receiving a complaint of disrepair in April last year. 

They found serious hazards that would affect the health and safety of the tenant, her young child and any visitors. 

These included inadequate fire detection systems, an insufficient number of (and faulty) power sockets, a risk of falling due to lack of light switches, a boiler that was not heating the property sufficiently, damp and mould where the roof was leaking, and escape windows on the first floor without appropriate safety catches. 

There were informal attempts to persuade Needham to carry out improvements but no work was done so officers served an improvement notice in June 2018. 

They revisited the property and found that while the roof had been replaced and the electrical system checked, the smoke alarms were not connected. 

The magistrates heard that a significant fire safety risk remained at the property and that the council was considering carrying out the works needed and recharging Needham.

In mitigation, Needham’s solicitor told the court that his client accepted she had not done enough to get the work done, but said that tradesmen had not always been allowed in to the property.
 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
It's the second offence by the owner in recent years...
Unsuccessful legal bids can leave tenants with bills of thousands...
But other categories of hazards have reduced, government figures show...
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The House of Lords committee stage now continues until May...
The removal of temporary rent controls may make buy-to-let more...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The illegal eviction took place in February 2024....
UK letting agents must check tenants and landlords against official...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here