“Worse than Scrooge!” – angry judge makes landlord pay £20,000

“Worse than Scrooge!” – angry judge makes landlord pay £20,000


Todays other news
The founder is going to step back from the business...
It has a growth strategy for this key market...
The institution's monthly survey measures agents' sentiment...
The analysis looks at rentals below £750 pcm...
The data comes from ARLA Propertymark...


A landlord has been ordered to pay almost £20,000 and has been told by a judge that he was meaner than Scrooge.

George Lindsay, from Birmingham, has pleaded guilty of failing to obtain an HMO licence and to 13 breaches of HMO Management Regulations.

He has been ordered to pay a fine of £19,970.

When issuing the sentence, the district judge commented that Scrooge was a philanthropist compared to Lindsay and confirmed that he would have sent him to prison if his sentencing powers would have allowed him to do so. 

The district judge also requested that HMRC reviews his financial records.

The court case followed an operation where Birmingham council worked with the police to initially gain access to one of the three properties owned by Lindsay. 

However, when council o fficers inspected the house, they were so concerned about the lack of fire precautions they contacted West Midlands Fire Service.

Almost all of the smoke detectors were missing from the house, putting the lives of the 10 people – including four children – who lived there in danger. WMFS oversaw the immediate installation of a working fire alarm system.

Other offences included a failure to license one of his properties, scorched electrical fittings, missing and inadequate fire doors, mattresses blocking fire escape routes and a failure to provide gas and electrical test certificates.

 

 

Leaks from a roof into a bedroom occupied by an adult and three children were found at another property while, another tenant had no kitchen facilities and was being forced instead to use a halogen heater placed on its side. 

Officers also found a missing shower head which meant that at least nine people had to share one bathroom.

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Agency hails “transformational” merger with lettings giant
The founder is going to step back from the business...
It has a growth strategy for this key market...
Revealed! The regions generating the most rent for landlords
The data comes from ARLA Propertymark...
Banned! Property management boss wrongly took out Covid loans
The ban was imposed by the First Tier Tribunal...
The sheet must be given to tenants by May 31...
The controversy involves the tenant union Acorn...
Well known business billionaire enters private rental sector as investor...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The founder is going to step back from the business...
It has a growth strategy for this key market...
The institution's monthly survey measures agents' sentiment...
Sponsored Content
Alto Intelligence, Street AI and Reapit RAI. Three platforms, three...
On Friday 15 May at 1pm, Alto is hosting a...
When Riccardo Iannucci-Dawson became CEO of Alto, he took the...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.