x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button
award
award award
award award

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Fightback Begins: council’s £1,200 licensing fee provokes backlash

One of the most pro-licensing local authorities in the country has extended its own scheme to include the entire centre of Bristol - but it’s now seeing a backlash.

The city council’s cabinet has agreed to expand the licensing scheme to include Houses in Multiple Occupation in 12 wards. The council says these 12 have been identified as areas with high concentrations of HMOs and where housing and management standards are likely to be poor compared with the city as a whole.

The wards will now be declared as areas where privately rented HMOs will require a licence under Part 2 of the Housing Act 2004.

The Labour-led council has previously had licensing in a much smaller area and insists that this has “made a significant difference to the living conditions of tenants in these neighbourhoods.”

It says that so far more than 4,400 licences have been issued and a statement from the council says: “The introduction of licensing schemes helps improve property conditions, as officers will be able to inspect every private rented property to check conditions and take action where standards are not met.”

However, it has emerged that the likely fee for the five year licence would be £1,200 - believed to be one of the most expensive in the UK - and involves a 38-point ‘test’ which has to be passed by applicants.

Now the BBC reports that the chair of the Association of Local Landlords in Wessex, Rob Crawford, says: "We are aware there are landlords who are not as good as others and do need some help and education in providing the appropriate standard of accommodation. But why should good landlords be charged to address those issues from rogue landlords?"

He also told the BBC that there was already a reporting system in place for tenants to report rogue landlords and that his group would be challenging the licence fee cost.

Bristol has seen aggressively anti-landlord and anti-letting agent activities in recent times.

In October last year the Lets Rent lettings agency refused to sign a pledge from a pro-tenant protest group and as a result, his agency office was the scene of a demonstration on a Saturday; also last year a former Bristol councillor said letting agents should be responsible for ensuring student tenants know how to organise their bins in a tidy manner; and for the past three years the Bristol branch of the campaign group ACORN has held protests outside agents’ offices in the city.

  • icon

    Nothing wrong with a hefty fee if it ensures sll landlords provide safe and decent accommodation. As a landlord I do not care for Councils. They are all profligate and gluttonous with taxpayer's money. But something tough needs doing to ensure decent let housing standards.

    S l
    • S l
    • 05 April 2019 09:47 AM

    Not by targetting the rest of those who are decent landlord. The council are paid through tax payer money. so why the hefty licencing fee and conditions. They are trying to upgrade private housing to the standard of hotels with out the hotels profits or charges. utterly unwarranted

     
  • Barry X

    What about a TENANT LICENCING SCHEME?!.... Bristol council "raises standards" by, ensuring nobody can rent until they've paid, say £500 to the council for a 2- year "licence to rent" and ticked 38 points in a ten page leaflet (full of partonising comments and silly childish cartoons) to confirm they don't plan to behave "antisocially" or forget to put out the recycling on the right days in the right containers, and of course won't damage the landlords property (3 - 4 pages devoted to things like remembering to leave the windows open a bit so the place doesn't go moldy, oh yes and not to flush condoms or nappies down the drains and only to use proper loo paper not huge wadges of wet-wipes that block the pipes - that would make a nice change)....

    Why not? If they want to make money and "raise standards" (which they never really do - all just lies)....

    or alternatively leave everyone alone and rely on existing laws that are more than enough already.

    Paul Barrett

    Because as you know all tenants are as pure as the driven snow and clearly can do no wrong.
    Anything that happens in a rental property is always the fault of the evil greedy LL.
    This is what Shelter and Councils believe.
    When as a LL you are up against such attitudes held as articles of faith LL simply don't stand a chance and are destined to be screwed over in perpetuity.
    As soon as you become a LL you become a hate figure to be bankrupted as soon as possible.

     
  • icon

    The question needs to be asked,of Bristol - What breaches and how many contraventions have been persued under the existing ( number of property licenses issued ) have been discovered and acted upon by the Local Authority.
    Further, How specifically has Liciensing helped to detect or bring those actions.
    Are Bristol using Civil penalties,
    Have they got a joined -up policy for Landlords AND Tenants ? Addressing only one side of the equation is well, short-sighted to say the least.
    Or, if truth be told by the statistics, is it just legalised Robbery.
    Rob, need to collate some statistics ( as mentioned above, and if you want any help or advice, just contact us )

    S l
    • S l
    • 05 April 2019 09:53 AM

    Agreed. The council cant just used words like significant to justify their hefty fee and licence. It have to be supported with concrete real evidence. All over UK, the council specifically pointed out that they are there for the tenant. Any issues with false allegation or tenant issues is not their problems. The tenant would go straight to council for any maintenance issue instead of landlord even though they have to first foremost inform the landlord first. The council ignored the contract and the law governing tenant landlord issues and said that is not their problem and just hand in improvement notice despite damaged caused by tenant and landlord cant deduct or make tenant pay to make good the damage if they fix it during the duration of the contract and not after the end of contract but council still say not their problem. Until and unless the council get sued, it will continue

     
    icon

    I suggest a FOI request PFPF.
    Let us all know how you get on please.

     
  • jeremy clarke

    With the 2016 Housing and Planning Act and all the other legislation available to the councils there is absolutely no reason for licensing.

  • icon

    Makes most LLs feel like erm, selling up. And they will, and rents will rise due to reduced availability and then there won't be enough property in the PRS to go round. That'll learn them Councils!

  • icon

    Nothing like a 'challenge' Paul, FOI just submitted - below ;

    " How may landlord licences have bee issued since the Selective Licensing began and how many contraventions of Licensed properties have been found.
    What are the categories of the Housing contraventions and their punishments - enforcement action."

icon

Please login to comment

Zero Deposit Zero Deposit Zero Deposit
sign up