Five agents kicked out of Ombudsman scheme after disputes

Five agents kicked out of Ombudsman scheme after disputes


Todays other news
RICS has been embroiled in controversies in recent years....
Many agents remain uncertain about where they stand...
The companies are Street Group and Goodlord...
Rent rises put down to ‘station surge’...


The Property Ombudsman has expelled five agencies, mostly for failures to honour awards: four of them are lettings operations and one disputes its status as an agency. Several of the firms are no longer trading.

DMF Inventories of Milton Keynes failed to register a landlord’s deposit with the Deposit Protection Service, and later failed to release a tenant’s deposit of £1,377. No response was made to TPO’s enquiries and an award made up of £1,377 for the tenant’s deposit and £300 compensation was not paid.

Also expelled was Plush Lettings of Carmarthenshire. In this case a landlord com that the agency failures to secure his property and erroneously destroyed belongings in a garage worth £8,743 after misinterpreting correspondence.

TPO recommended £1,850 compensation with £150 for the aggravation, distress and inconvenience but these sums were not paid. Plush appears to be operating, according to the Ombudsman’s office. 

In the case of Chebar Homes of London, TPO received multiple complaints by landlords regarding the handling of rent payments and subsequent complaints.

An award for £1,556 was made, but Chebar Homes failed to pay.

Concept Lettings Ltd of Reading has been expelled following failure to pay £4,704 awarded following a dispute over a landlord’s instruction for the agency to secure a tenant on a find-only basis. The landlord complained about allegedly poor referencing by the agency, following the tenant defaulting. 

The Ombudsman considered that referencing to be inadequate. 

The only TPO expulsion regarding a sales issue applies to EstateEducation of Norwich; a buyer paid the company a £500 Reservation Fee in anticipation of purchasing under the Right to Buy Scheme.

The Ombudsman considered it reasonable for EstatEducation to pay the buyer £375 but the company disputes the findings.

 

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The illegal eviction took place in February 2024....
The idea is from Patrick Bullick, owner and managing director...
It's the second offence by the owner in recent years...
This is the latest partner service available at a discount...
It now progresses to the so-called Report Stage....
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The House of Lords committee stage now continues until May...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
RICS has been embroiled in controversies in recent years....
Many agents remain uncertain about where they stand...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here