Five agents kicked out of Ombudsman scheme after disputes

Five agents kicked out of Ombudsman scheme after disputes


Todays other news
The Property Franchise Group (TPFG) has labelled the latest landlord...
Tenants are spending an average of 39% of their income...
Deposit alternative provider Reposit has partnered with seven letting agency...
Carvers has expanded its town centre office in Darlington....


The Property Ombudsman has expelled five agencies, mostly for failures to honour awards: four of them are lettings operations and one disputes its status as an agency. Several of the firms are no longer trading.

DMF Inventories of Milton Keynes failed to register a landlord’s deposit with the Deposit Protection Service, and later failed to release a tenant’s deposit of £1,377. No response was made to TPO’s enquiries and an award made up of £1,377 for the tenant’s deposit and £300 compensation was not paid.

Also expelled was Plush Lettings of Carmarthenshire. In this case a landlord com that the agency failures to secure his property and erroneously destroyed belongings in a garage worth £8,743 after misinterpreting correspondence.

TPO recommended £1,850 compensation with £150 for the aggravation, distress and inconvenience but these sums were not paid. Plush appears to be operating, according to the Ombudsman’s office. 

In the case of Chebar Homes of London, TPO received multiple complaints by landlords regarding the handling of rent payments and subsequent complaints.

An award for £1,556 was made, but Chebar Homes failed to pay.

Concept Lettings Ltd of Reading has been expelled following failure to pay £4,704 awarded following a dispute over a landlord’s instruction for the agency to secure a tenant on a find-only basis. The landlord complained about allegedly poor referencing by the agency, following the tenant defaulting. 

The Ombudsman considered that referencing to be inadequate. 

The only TPO expulsion regarding a sales issue applies to EstateEducation of Norwich; a buyer paid the company a £500 Reservation Fee in anticipation of purchasing under the Right to Buy Scheme.

The Ombudsman considered it reasonable for EstatEducation to pay the buyer £375 but the company disputes the findings.

 

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The average delay for Country Court bailiffs in London alone...
Agents demand action to reduce bailiff backlog
Several trade bodies have united to make the call for...
Think tank chief defends private rental sector from attack 
The MP's eviction of tenants was exposed by a newspaper...
Damp and Mould - new guidance from Propertymark
A landlord and property management firm failed to conduct essential...
It was thought at one stage that the Bill would...
It appears Knight Frank was involved at one stage...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The Property Franchise Group (TPFG) has labelled the latest landlord...
Tenants are spending an average of 39% of their income...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.