£87,000 fine after rental flats declared “serious risk to life”

£87,000 fine after rental flats declared “serious risk to life”


Todays other news
Agency boss and army veteran escapes jail after fraud conviction...
Ma ny of the Renters Rights Act measures kick in...
A detailed analysis undertaken by Hamptons...
Savills has undertaken a thorough analysis...
Nathan Emerson shares the portal's upbeat assessment of the market...


A buy to let investor has been found guilty of letting out poor quality living accommodation that was said to pose “a serious risk to life.”

Deepak Singh Sashdeva was found guilty in his absence of offences under the Housing Act 2004 Licensing and Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation 2007 in regard to living accommodation he was renting out at his Premier shop premises in Bristol. 

Council environmental health officers found three people, including two young children, sleeping in cupboards in the eaves of the roof. 

Officers also noted that the two separate living spaces housed nine people including two children and a pregnant woman.

The accommodation was found to be of poor structural condition and design, posing serious risk to life due to inadequate fire separation and precautions. 

There was very poor fire resistant separation between the shop store and the flat above, with the floorboards of the living accommodation clearly visible from the storage area immediately below.

Other property defects included large gaps around fire doors, offering no protection from potential fire or smoke hazards. There was no working fire detection in place prior to emergency smoke detectors being fitted by the council.

One of the flats also lacked basic ventilation, with no external windows and limited access via a poorly maintained staircase.

Singh Sashdeva was ordered to pay £87,000 in fines, with a victim surcharge of £120. In addition, Bristol council was awarded £1434 towards costs. 

The magistrates felt that the high penalty reflected the money made from the tenants, given the severity of complete disregard for the safety of tenants, particularly children and the serious risk to life the property posed.

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Smoke Alarms rarely tested, sometimes never - shock figures
London Fire Bridge had over 200 such fires to attend...
Agents would be able to identify early signs of damp,...
Agency fined for “reckless” endangering of tenants in flats
A landlord and a letting agent have been ordered to...
Smoke Alarms rarely tested, sometimes never - shock figures
A House of Lords Committee has warned the government of...
The government has published the wording for new written statements...
The government says it will, in the long term, base...
LRG - the former Leaders Romans Group - is issuing...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Agency boss and army veteran escapes jail after fraud conviction...
Ma ny of the Renters Rights Act measures kick in...
A detailed analysis undertaken by Hamptons...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.