“Give landlords 80% guaranteed rent” demands controversial agency

“Give landlords 80% guaranteed rent” demands controversial agency


Todays other news
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
It’s in London’s Notting Hill - following an existing branch...
The protest is by the London Renters Union...
Reapit has entered a partnership with HomeLet and Let Alliance...
A council wants to be able to seize properties empty...


Part of the controversial Spicerhaart empire want the government to guarantee that some landlords receive 80 per cent of their usual rent income throughout the Coronavirus crisis. 

Spicerhaart hit the headlines 10 days ago when there was a high number of lay-offs and permanent branch closures announced at short notice, minutes before the Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced a bail-out scheme that other agencies have used to keep staff on board.

The way the redundancies were handled – at least one senior negotiator says she was fired at 5.45pm on a Friday with no assurance she would be paid – was described by some in the industry as “inhumane” and generated national newspaper publicity.

Now Spicerhaart’s corporate sales division says it wants the government to step in to help small-scale landlords. 

Managing director Mark Pilling says: “While a blanket freeze on all possessions activity will protect tenants in the short term, it is bound to lead to an accumulation of arrears that will be all the harder to deal with once the freeze is lifted.

“If there seem to be no consequences to non-payment, some struggling tenants will naturally prioritise other bills, and will be more likely to ignore attempts to communicate with them to manage the situation.

“A three-month ban on possessions activity will result in even longer spells without rental income – possibly six months or more of state-enforced void periods.

“Payment holidays on buy-to-let mortgages will be of limited help to landlords who in many cases rely on income from a small number of properties. If one or more of these is not generating an income for an extended period, it could cause families real financial difficulty.

“It seems only fair that [rental income] should be subject to the same government guarantees as other income affected by the restrictions currently in place.”

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
Urgent need for greater enforcement of standards for temporary accommodation...
Sex for Rent is not part of the Crime and...
LRG has introduced its Enhanced Neonatal Care Leave Policy...
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The removal of temporary rent controls may make buy-to-let more...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The scheme is operated on behalf of the government by...
It’s in London’s Notting Hill - following an existing branch...
The protest is by the London Renters Union...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here