Anti-Money Laundering: ARLA worry over agents’ responsibilities

Anti-Money Laundering: ARLA worry over agents’ responsibilities


Todays other news
The decision was made by the Monetary Policy Committee....
The list contains deliberate tax defaulters...
Reapit is the latest PropTech supplier to create an an...
He's the former chief operating officer of a property investment...


ARLA Propertymark has set out its concerns over draft guidance on anti-money laundering produced by a body called the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group.

The JMLSG is a private sector body consisting of financial services trade associations and while its guidance is not legally binding it does receive HM Treasury approval.

ARLA Propertymark’s concern is that the guidance expects letting agents to conduct customer due diligence to a level that goes beyond legal requirements.

A statement on the ARLA website, relating to the concerns it has put to the private sector body, says:

“Financial institutions must be aware that under the Money Laundering Regulations the scope of regulated businesses in the property agency sector was expanded in January 2020 to only include the letting agency sector for high-value transactions with a monthly rent of 10,000 euros (or an equivalent amount) or more, whereas all letting agents in England, Wales and Scotland must adhere to Client Money Protection rules.

“Within the current framework for Pooled Client Accounts, letting agents find it very difficult to open client accounts with no legal requirement for all letting agents to register with HMRC for Anti-Money Laundering Supervision. This makes it very difficult for letting agents to adhere to the Client Money Protection rules.

“Unless these regulations are explicitly stated in the guidance Propertymark is concerned that firms will continue to be unable to distinguish between those letting agents who need to comply with Anti-Money Laundering requirements and all letting agents who are required to comply with the Client Money Protection rules.”

ARLA Propertymark then sets out specific amendments it believes should be made to the JMLSG guidance to bring it into line with legal requirements.

You can read the full and detailed ARLA letter to the body here.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Nicole Knight is reported to have siphoned off rent money...
The demand comes from charity Independent Age...
Landlord instructions continue to dwindle, RICS members report...
Suffolk Building Society has relaxed its mortgage criteria...
It now progresses to the so-called Report Stage....
The House of Lords committee stage now continues until May...
Richard Donnell is a leading lettings market analyst...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
The decision was made by the Monetary Policy Committee....
The list contains deliberate tax defaulters...
Reapit is the latest PropTech supplier to create an an...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here