x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
CORONAVIRUS UPDATE

See the latest Coronavirus statistics from across the world on our world map SEE MAP UK Confirmed cases: 314,992 | UK Deaths: 43,991 SEE MAP Italy Confirmed cases: 240,760 | Italy Deaths: 34,788 | Italy Recovered: 190,717 SEE MAP Spain Confirmed cases: 249,659 | Spain Deaths: 28,364 | Spain Recovered: 150,376 SEE MAP See the latest Coronavirus statistics from across the world on our world map SEE MAP UK Confirmed cases: 314,992 | UK Deaths: 43,991 SEE MAP Italy Confirmed cases: 240,760 | Italy Deaths: 34,788 | Italy Recovered: 190,717 SEE MAP Spain Confirmed cases: 249,659 | Spain Deaths: 28,364 | Spain Recovered: 150,376 SEE MAP

award
award award
award award

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Over a billion pounds in deposits could be unprotected - claim

One of the growing number of deposit replacement providers claims that there could be £1.2 billion in deposit monies that are not protected by letting agents or landlords.

Hamilton Fraser’s Ome service says there are an estimated 3.5m deposits protected across the entire market, totalling some £3.9 billion - based on the typical tenant deposit of £1,139 on average. 

Ome compared these statistics with the latest English Housing Survey report which shows an estimated 4.6m tenancies in the private rental sector in 2019. 

With only 3.5m of these tenancy deposits accounted for in protection schemes, Ome claims there are potentially 1.1m tenancies that either have not had a deposit protected, do not have deposits, or are using deposit replacement products. 

“At worst, there could be as much as £1.2 billion in deposit monies that are not protected” it claims in a statement.

The service also quotes a report by the Centre for Economics and Business Research which produces a different figure. 

It estimates that 14.5 per cent of all deposits held are not protected by landlords or agents. This means of the estimated 1.1m tenancy deposits that are unaccounted for, just over 500,000 cash deposits could currently be unprotected, putting £578m at risk.

“It’s impossible to tell just how many deposits are still sat unprotected in the bank accounts of either rogue landlords or agents but based on market data we can make a conservative estimate that this total value runs into the hundreds of millions of pounds” says Ome co-founder Matthew Hooker.

  • jeremy clarke

    Thus 16 years after introduction of tdps yet gov plough on with more legislation? Why not get 1 thing right before introducing the next?

  • Matthew Payne

    That would be assuming all are ASTs which they won't be. A good number will be Non Housing Act tenancies where deposits don't need protecting - where the rent is too high, there is a resident landlord or a company let as 3 examples.

icon

Please login to comment

Zero Deposit Zero Deposit Zero Deposit
sign up