Eviction ban by the back door! Top lawyer slams bailiffs’ move

Eviction ban by the back door! Top lawyer slams bailiffs’ move


Todays other news
Knight Frank, which founded OnTheMarket, has signed a three-year deal...
The former independent has three offices and manages over 700...
867,000 households headed by people aged 55+ are in the...
South East property group Beresford has secured sponsorship from Rightmove...


A top property lawyer says a recent decision by bailiffs not to forcibly evict anyone in Tier 2 and Tier 3 is an eviction ban by the back door.

At the end of last week the government asked bailiffs not to enforce court possession orders in areas with the highest Coronavirus restrictions. So although evictions can still proceed through the courts, bailiffs will not enforce court orders in Tier 2 and 3 areas. 

Bailiff trade bodies agreed to the request made in a letter from Justice Secretary Robert Buckland who wrote: “We would request that your members should instruct the enforcement agents working under their authorisation not to enter properties that are classified as local alert level 2 (high) or 3 (very high).”

Now David Smith, partner at JMW Solicitors, has hit out at the move. 

“Naturally, evictions create hardship for those being evicted, probably more so right now. However, leaving tenants with huge arrears in place also creates hardship as the debt will follow them” he says. 

“The problem with the government’s approach is that it is almost certainly unlawful. It is not open to bailiffs or High Court Sheriffs to simply decline to enforce warrants and writs, even if the Lord Chancellor asks them to do so. 

“They have a duty to do this. Indeed, there is a power to complain to the County Court, in the County Courts Act, about losses resulting from Bailiffs not enforcing warrants.

“This approach flies in the face of the new structures created around the re-opening of the courts for possession. 

“Of course the government can prevent evictions if it wishes to. But it should do so lawfully by making regulations under the appropriate legislation and allowing Parliament to review them, not through backdoor letters to enforcement bodies. I have offered to seek judicial review on this on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis for affected landlords.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The Advertising Standards Authority slapped down portal OnTheMarket....
Propertymark is working with the High Court Enforcement Officers Association...
The illegal eviction took place in February 2024....
UK letting agents must check tenants and landlords against official...
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The House of Lords committee stage now continues until May...
The removal of temporary rent controls may make buy-to-let more...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Knight Frank, which founded OnTheMarket, has signed a three-year deal...
The former independent has three offices and manages over 700...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here