Eviction ban by the back door! Top lawyer slams bailiffs’ move

Eviction ban by the back door! Top lawyer slams bailiffs’ move


Todays other news
There are some 150 properties on the acquired agency's books...
The Renters Rights Act provisions are being set out for...
The successful candidate joined LRG some two years ago...
Goodlord has published its latest index...


A top property lawyer says a recent decision by bailiffs not to forcibly evict anyone in Tier 2 and Tier 3 is an eviction ban by the back door.

Advertisement

At the end of last week the government asked bailiffs not to enforce court possession orders in areas with the highest Coronavirus restrictions. So although evictions can still proceed through the courts, bailiffs will not enforce court orders in Tier 2 and 3 areas. 

Advertisement

Bailiff trade bodies agreed to the request made in a letter from Justice Secretary Robert Buckland who wrote: “We would request that your members should instruct the enforcement agents working under their authorisation not to enter properties that are classified as local alert level 2 (high) or 3 (very high).”

Advertisement

Now David Smith, partner at JMW Solicitors, has hit out at the move. 

“Naturally, evictions create hardship for those being evicted, probably more so right now. However, leaving tenants with huge arrears in place also creates hardship as the debt will follow them” he says. 

Advertisement

“The problem with the government’s approach is that it is almost certainly unlawful. It is not open to bailiffs or High Court Sheriffs to simply decline to enforce warrants and writs, even if the Lord Chancellor asks them to do so. 

“They have a duty to do this. Indeed, there is a power to complain to the County Court, in the County Courts Act, about losses resulting from Bailiffs not enforcing warrants.

Advertisement

“This approach flies in the face of the new structures created around the re-opening of the courts for possession. 

“Of course the government can prevent evictions if it wishes to. But it should do so lawfully by making regulations under the appropriate legislation and allowing Parliament to review them, not through backdoor letters to enforcement bodies. I have offered to seek judicial review on this on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis for affected landlords.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Licensed stamp and licensed document for letting agents.
Busy real estate expo with attendees and booths in a large hall.
The event takes place in March...
Red auction sign on a street with houses in the background.
Stacked coins with a house-shaped sign saying Property Tax.
The next deadline is little over one month away...
Landlords are selling up and rents are rising as a...
This is apparent in the prime lettings segment, it's claimed...
The fine was slightly reduced in return for rapid payment...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
There are some 150 properties on the acquired agency's books...
The Renters Rights Act provisions are being set out for...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.