x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Agent left property front door open after routine inspection

The This Is Money website is carrying a story of a London rental property where the front door was left open by a letting agent for six hours following a routine inspection.

The story is in an insurance advice column, so no agents or tenants are named, although the site says the story is both true and accurate. 

“Me and my partner rent a two bedroom flat in London. Every six months the estate agent does a property inspection to ensure there is no damage to the home. We were told no one needs to be at the property when the inspection is made as they have keys and will let themselves in and lock up. Therefore, we both went to work as normal” says the tenant in their letter to the website.

Advertisement

“When I came back, I found our flat door wide open. Fortunately, nothing was taken and it didn’t look like anyone had been in but it had been open for six hours. I told the agent who was very apologetic but I want to know what who would be liable if something had been taken or broken? I have home insurance but surely the agent would be at fault?”

The agent is described as being “very apologetic” but the property was in a shared block with access routinely given to repair and delivery teams working on other properties.

Two insurance companies are quoted in response to the incident.

A spokesman for Comparethemarket says: “It’s best to get in contact with your provider to check your terms and conditions, as some providers do have exclusions and require evidence of ‘force and violence’ to gain entry to a property for claims to be paid out. Claims often need to be reported to the police within a set number of hours too - typically between 24 to 48 hours.

“If a door is left open by the policyholder, this could be considered negligence and against the conditions of the policy – meaning the customer hasn’t taken reasonable steps to prevent loss or damage.”

Meanwhile a spokesperson for Lloyds Home Insurance adds: “Where theft from the home occurs due to negligence from a third party it is important to let the police know and call your insurer to discuss what has happened.“

You can see the story here.

  • icon

    I suspect any loss would form part of a PI claim against the agent. Many years ago, I didn’t shut the gate on a cottage in the New Forest properly. The vendor got home to discover the ponies had eaten her much loved garden. 😬

  • Neil Moores

    I love the insurance company "non-answers". We all know that you need to report burglaries and theft to the police. The question asked whether the insurance would pay out in those particular circumstances. There was no answer to the question which was would insurance cover the Tenants in this situation.

    icon
    • 03 November 2020 12:08 PM

    Exactly the opposite victims of crime should never report them.
    The reason is that for at least 5 years after the thefts insurers will load up any insurance premiums factoring that theft.

    Far better to lie to insurance companies.
    If you don't report thefts then insurers can never find out and so they can't load your insurance premiums.

    Unfortunately I foolishly in a moment of utter madness reported a theft from my car to the Police and insurer.

    Losses were about £250.

    For another 3 years vehicle insurers are adding £200 to my premiums which should be about £245 but now £430.

    Lying is the only way to avoid being stitched up by insurers.

    Don't claim on insurances unless for major obvious losses.

    The thief that stole from me will be costing me an extra £1200 in additional premiums over 5 years.

    Learn to lie to insurers.
    Don't claim and don't tell Police.

    I fail to see why my insurance should increase due to a non-road based loss which never paid out

    In future I will remember to be economical with the truth as I have been in the past.

    I think on the day I just lost all sense of reason.
    Probably because I was moving into a property that day.

    So my own stupid fault for telling the truth!!
    A very expensive £1200 lesson!!

     
  • Mark Wilson

    Amazing what constitutes news.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up