By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Legal group considers how courts will handle evictions after ban

It’s been revealed that a legal group is considering how courts will consider eviction cases when the current ban is lifted in late August.

Sir Terence Atherton - Master of the Rolls and Chair of the independent civil justice council and Head of Civil Justice - has written about the new body in a Civil Justice Council report which considers the range of legal processes and how they should be handled during the Coronavirus crisis.

His statement was: “In particular responding to concerns expressed by a number of consultees about the consequences of the current stay on housing possession claims ending. I have established a cross-sector working group, which is being chaired by Mr Justice Knowles, the chair of the Civil Justice Council’s Access to Justice Sub Committee, to help address these concerns.”


ARLA Propertymark, which has assessed the full Civil Justice Council report, says its main conclusion in regard to the resumption of eviction cases from late August onwards is that remote hearings specifically for case management discussions would be suitable in cases where both sides are represented.

However possession hearings were felt to raise numerous difficulties and were unsuitable for remote determination.

Suggestions made by respondents to the Civil Justice Council review to enable possession hearings to resume included:

- Stronger Pre-Action Protocols for private rented sector evictions based on those used by social landlords in possession cases. “This would require landlords and lenders to demonstrate that they have taken proactive steps to secure legal advice for tenants and generalist advice (this would need to be funded by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government) to assist with the resolution of any underlying issues with accessing welfare benefits” explains ARLA; 

- An expansion in the availability of legal advice to all parties; and

- Temporary relaxation of Housing Act 1988 Ground 8, to reflect the circumstances created by the pandemic and protect public health.

No timescale has been given for the new working party to report, although the evictions ban is currently scheduled to end on August 23.

You can read the full 89-page Civil Justice Council report here.

  • Mark Wilson

    I want to know how they will deal with the tenant behind the front door who asks the bailiff to come back another day as someone inside the house has been coughing all night and has a fever.

    I saw a documentary the other night looking at housing evictions in the USA. No messing about there, the sheriff comes round with his gun once the court paper work is processed. That was compared to France, where it was suggested that the process on average takes 18 months.

    Pretty sure I know which the readers on this site prefer.

  • PossessionFriendUK PossessionFriend

    So ARLA have now joined the NRLA ( who originally applauded the Govt's action on Covid Possession ) in supporting Pre-Action Protocol ! ( PaP )

    Landlords will have had conversations with the Tenant on a number of occasions about outstanding Rent, - Obviously ( who wouldn't have ! ) but it should not be a condition of a landlord to regain lawful possession of their property where in excess of 2 or 3 months rent is overdue.

    If Govt want to protect renters from their Financially contractual obligations, then they can pay their rent, or else let the legal process take its course.

  • icon

    If Govt want to protect renters from their Financially contractual obligations

    Sorry I don't see it like that. The contract is in place and the Gov't would clearly be condoning breaking a legal contract. That, Mr Possession Friend is criminal by way of aiding and abetting criminal activity.

    Unless of course you can show me otherwise.

    PossessionFriendUK PossessionFriend

    I don't think we're in disagreement Ret. Agent. My argument is the tenant pays or Govt pays if Tenant isn't able to.
    I only wish Not paying rent Was Criminal, unfortunately, Private debt is left to the ineffective Civil Justice (sic) process - unless the debt is to the Govt, - Tax whereby there is custodial sanctions.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up