‘No DSS’ – apology by lettings agency after advertisement blunder

‘No DSS’ – apology by lettings agency after advertisement blunder


Todays other news


A lettings agency which markets private rental properties and units operated by a housing association has apologised for its ‘No DSS’ advertisement. 

Equity Housing advertised a private landlord’s property stating that individuals on benefits would not be accepted as tenants. Specifically the wording, contained in the property details, stated: “Full-time applicants only and no DSS considered”.

Portals, redress services and most estate agencies have themselves long stated that such advertising is not only discriminatory but against their own corporate policies. 

Just last month another lettings agency was found to have unlawfully discriminated against a tenant receiving benefits.

Worthing County Court declared that Michael Jones & Company unlawfully refused to show Hayley Pearce a potential rental property because she receives benefits. 

According to campaigning charity Shelter, which took up the case on the tenant’s behalf, an agency employee told Pearce over the phone that people in receipt of benefits would not be acceptable’ to the landlord, without checking whether she could afford the rent. 

In this latest issue, the housing association which runs the agency at the centre of the controversy – Great Places – said the advert was “unacceptable” and “falls short” of the group’s standards.

Guy Cresswell, executive director of customer services at Great Places, has issued a statement saying: “We wholeheartedly apologise for the content of the advert and understand the upset that it has caused. It is unacceptable for this wording to have been used and it does not reflect group policy.

“We believe that the wording was copied from an old advert which we accept falls short of our own high standards. It has been removed and won’t be used in future adverts.”

There’s been a series of high profile legal cases concerning No DSS adverts.

 

Last year Midlands agency Paul Carr told disabled tenant Stephen Tyler it had a policy of not accepting renters receiving benefits, triggering a case at Birmingham County Court which the agency lost.

And last summer a court in York found a single mother of two had experienced indirect discrimination when a letting agent in the city refused to rent to her.

 

Tags: Finance

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Andrews Property Group is under charitable ownership...
The supplier says half of its clients now use open...
The Bank’s monetary committee has made its decision...
The Welsh Government is backing the call for a 'compensation'...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
A consultation document is being released today....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Andrews Property Group is under charitable ownership...
New tenancies in England and Wales are at their lowest...
The Scottish system would differ from the UK system in...
Sponsored Content
Tenants want a place they can call home—somewhere comfortable, safe,...
Letting agencies face the dual challenge of keeping both landlords...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here