Tenants “discriminated against” by sloppy referencing, claims PropTech firm

Tenants “discriminated against” by sloppy referencing, claims PropTech firm


Todays other news
That’s the claim from property management firm Rushbrook & Rathbone...
LSLEAF’s biggest existing franchise partner is called National Home Move....
It appears landlords were trying to get ahead of the...
Flaties specialises in student accommodation, temporary housing and long-term rentals...
New figure revealed for rent increases as every region shows a rise


A PropTech company says sloppy referencing by agents and landlords effectively means that around a third of prospective tenants are discriminated against.

Due diligence firm Homeppl claims that this is because referencing typically relies on credit files – therefore those who don’t have one are often unable to get approval or are required to pay anything up to 100 per cent of the rent up front.

“Anyone who doesn’t have a credit report – common amongst international tenants, the self-employed, students, and high net worth individuals – would generally be required to provide between 50 and 100 per cent of the rent upfront” claims Alexander Siedes, founder of Homeppl. 

“This means they have to stump-up around £25,000 on average, and if they can’t afford that they must find a UK based guarantor – a UK homeowner earning circa £84,000 per year.”

 

He continues: “But it doesn’t need to be this way. Tenant referencing is generally carried out by insurance companies who use it as a loss-leader to sell rent guarantee insurance to landlords and they do a sloppy job assessing tenants. 

“They automatically deny ‘invisible consumers’, those without credit reports, forcing them to pay rent upfront, while their inability to detect fraud or authentic data results in 8.0 per cent defaults and 1.6 per cent court possession claims in the private rented sector.”

He says that last week’s campaign by activist group Generation Rent – which held a Renters’ Rights Week based on webinars – was a good opportunity to demonstrate discriminatory referencing simply because of what Homeppl calls “bad due diligence practices.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Renters Reform Bill attacked by another legal expert
That’s the claim from property management firm Rushbrook & Rathbone...
Pressure mounts on politicians to relax proposed eviction rules change
It appears landlords were trying to get ahead of the...
pound sign in house model
Lomond has a substantial quarterly report on the lettings market...
Delay EPC change to help rental sector - top agency’s Budget hope
Sally Lawson is the founder of Agent Rainmaker...
The sheet must be given to tenants by May 31...
Well known business billionaire enters private rental sector as investor...
And on top of those three, there are further reforms...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
That’s the claim from property management firm Rushbrook & Rathbone...
LSLEAF’s biggest existing franchise partner is called National Home Move....
Sponsored Content
Alto Intelligence, Street AI and Reapit RAI. Three platforms, three...
On Friday 15 May at 1pm, Alto is hosting a...
When Riccardo Iannucci-Dawson became CEO of Alto, he took the...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.