“Blatant, continuous breach of regulations” lands HMO firm in court

“Blatant, continuous breach of regulations” lands HMO firm in court


Todays other news
Landlords will need to carefully navigate the challenges of tenant...
More than eight in ten (84%) of landlords are unprepared...
New research has found that the London Marathon route offers...
Beauchamp Estates, one of the best-known names in luxury property,...
Conveyancing solicitors and estate agency payroll teams are among those...
Warrant for arrest of letting agent who failed to appear in court


A company which operated an unlicensed HMO and its then-director have lost their appeal against the imposition of financial penalties. 

Gatwick and Crawley Rooms Limited Ltd and its director at the time, Carolyne Hunt, were issued with notices imposing financial penalties of £10,000 each by Crawley council in December 2020 for an offence of managing and operating a HMO without a licence contrary to section 72 of the Housing Act 2004.

Councils are able to impose financial penalties as an alternative to prosecuting for certain criminal offences.

The decision to impose financial penalties was made following an investigation by the council into a potential HMO in a four-bedroom home. 

The investigation found that the HMO was unlicensed, lacked a number of fire protection measures, and had only one small kitchen and inadequate bathroom facilities for the potential number of occupants.

 

The company and Hunt appealed the council’s decision to the First-Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property). 

The Tribunal decided to amend the penalties to £15,000 for Hunt and £5,000 for Gatwick and Crawley Rooms Limited Ltd.

An application for permission to appeal was refused.

The decision notice says: “The Tribunal is entirely satisfied that [Crawley Borough Council’s] procedures were carried out properly and fairly and in the face of a blatant and continuous breach of the regulations considers that [Crawley Borough Council’s] decision to impose only the minimum financial penalty was generous.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The new look “draws on decades of affection and enthusiasm...
Lovin’ It - ex-McDonalds man is new Rightmove boss
Expert Tips on Properly Measuring Sash Windows Before Replacement
The brokerages have entered into a strategic partnership...
Property investment leader jumps ship to Savills 
He brings extensive experience gained in London’s prime lettings market...
LRG - the former Leaders Romans Group - is issuing...
The sheet must be given to tenants by May 31...
The Renters Rights Act comes into effect on May 1...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Landlords will need to carefully navigate the challenges of tenant...
More than eight in ten (84%) of landlords are unprepared...
New research has found that the London Marathon route offers...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.