Fake letting agencies created to avoid identifying landlord

Fake letting agencies created to avoid identifying landlord


Todays other news


A landlord has pleaded guilty to four offences which involved the creation of fake letting agencies in order to help him escape detection.

Thomas Flight, a landlord in Bristol, ran a property management firm operating from the city.

The business went by a number of different trading names, meaning no one ever really knew who they were dealing with or who was responsible when problems arose. The various trading names were also used for the3 collection of fees, charges and rents.

Tenants received what Bristol council calls “made up information” about fake letting agencies, including false names and addresses. He also registered a fictitious person as a director of one of his companies. 

Now, following a lengthy investigation by Bristol council, Flight has been fined £12,000 and ordered to pay the council’s £25,000 of costs.  He pleaded guilty at Bristol Crown Court to committing consumer protection offences against his tenants and – after several hearings – an agreement was reached between Flight and the council for him to plead guilty to four of six charges against him.

The court heard that Flight’s identity was hidden from his tenants, allowing him to keep security deposit money instead of returning it, and to avoid responsibility for a number of unfair commercial practices including charging banned and hidden fees to tenants.

Tenants would receive made-up landlord and agent information, including false names and addresses. Tenants who complained were then harassed with demands to withdraw their valid enquiries, until the local authority took up these complaints as part of its investigation. 

In February 2021, Flight was interviewed by the council and subsequently voluntarily repaid those tenants who had been charged banned fees or whose security deposits had not been returned when they should have been.

During this interview, Flight blamed the situation on an alleged letting agent who couldn’t be traced and is believed, in the council’s words, “to be another of his inventions.”

At one of Flight’s court hearings in relation to this case, he supplied further documents to Bristol City Council containing more landlord details that also proved to be false.

He has been fined £12,000 and ordered to pay the council’s £25,000 of costs. But he has not been banned from letting properties as these numerous offences are not Banning Order offences under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
It completed its Commons stage last week...
LRG is one of five organisations to co-sign the letter...
Council officers and the Green MP want licensing to last...
It's been dominant across politics, the press and broadcasting, and...
A leading agent says there are renegotiations on prices of...
Reeves to slash Right To Buy discount on Wednesday...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
It completed its Commons stage last week...
Rent rises are now roughly in line with increases in...
It's another office for the Pygott & Crone agency...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here