Pooled Client Accounts – banks accused of making mistakes

Pooled Client Accounts – banks accused of making mistakes


Todays other news


Propertymark says banks are still misinterpreting Anti-Money Laundering rules regarding pooled client accounts, making life difficult for letting agents. 

The trade body says it’s routinely battling with banks, industry groups and government officials on behalf of members who have unnecessarily had accounts closed or restricted as they fall outside of the scope of AML regulations because they do not manage high-value properties with monthly rental incomes of 10,000 euros or more.

Propertymark letting agent members have reported that banks are asking them to carry out Customer Due Diligence to the level as set out in the Money Laundering Regulations when not all letting agents are legally required to do so.

The agents’ body says one solution to this is for the UK government to remove the EUR 10,000 monthly rent threshold and set this at zero to create consistency and cover all tenancies let in the private rented sector. 

Therefore, all letting agents would be required to register with HMRC for Anti-Money Laundering Supervision which would provide banks with the reassurance they need and reduce a barrier that can make it hard for agents to operate.

Banks are also being reminded that rather than making arbitrary decisions they should be referring to updated industry guidance from the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group – the forum that should be the final decision-maker. 

Propertymark lobbied for the JMLSG guidance to be improved and now says it’s frustrated at the inconsistency for its members because not all banks are following it. The guidance is not legally binding but has HM Treasury approval.

Propertymark compliance manager David Oliver says: “This is a frustrating, time consuming and unnecessary issue for our members especially when the banking industry’s own guidance from the JMLSG is clear that the legal requirement for CMP and our own regulatory rules as a professional body should be enough to satisfy any risk.

“For letting agents, it is simply not feasible to have separate accounts for each of their clients or even necessary if they are Propertymark members because of the protections in place through our compliance process that requires them to provide details of their CMP on an annual basis.

“We are continuing to engage directly with banks, the financial sector and governments and would also encourage any members that have pooled client accounts closed to use the JMLSG guidance and their Propertymark membership to confidently challenge those decisions.”

One solution is for letting agents to use a Client Accounting Service Provider  which is a third-party organisation that manages client money on behalf of the agent.

 

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Subscribe to comments
Notify of
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Rental reform requires investment in courts, claims Law Society...
Mortgages key to recent housing market boost, say multiple agents...
Propertymark on the attack against Capital Gains Tax rise...
Agents attacked for “dated and stagnant services” to landlords...
A new Renters' Rights Bill is to be introduced into...
New figures published by HMRC show a 7% rise in...
A lettings agency chief says there’s growing discussion about rent...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
PropTech provider Reapit will announce the latest enhancement to its...
Sponsored Content
PropTech provider Reapit will announce the latest enhancement to its...
B-hive Block Management Partners Celebrates Major Milestone With Over 100...
We’re absolutely delighted to announce that, after 10 years, we’re...
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here