Rogue agency expelled from Ombudsman but still trading illegally

Rogue agency expelled from Ombudsman but still trading illegally


Todays other news
RICS has been embroiled in controversies in recent years....
Many agents remain uncertain about where they stand...
The companies are Street Group and Goodlord...
Rent rises put down to ‘station surge’...


A rogue lettings agency in London has been expelled from The Property Ombudsman scheme but is still thought to be trading.

Hawks Properties Limited, trading from an address in Stratford, East London, has been expelled from TPO for failing to pay compensation of £10,264.50 to a landlord following a formal complaint investigation. 

Despite an inactive website, The Property Ombudsman has been informed that the company appears to still be trading illegally, offering properties to let. Trading Standards has been informed.

The landlord instructed Hawks Properties Limited to let and fully manage his property, and the landlord also opted into a rental insurance package in return for a higher management fee.

The property was let to two tenants but six months later they stopped paying rent. 

Hawks Properties made a claim on the rental insurance, but the claim was declined by the insurance provider. Hawks Properties admitted this was due to a procedural error on its part.

Hawks Properties assisted the landlord in regaining possession of the property and the tenants were evicted one year after they stopped paying rent, returning the property in a very poor condition and owing around £12,000 in rent.

The landlord made a complaint to The Property Ombudsman, seeking compensation for the £12,000 arrears and a further £7,000 to cover damage caused to the property by the tenants.

The Ombudsman supported a complaint regarding referencing. It was found that Hawks Properties was notified of the possibility that the tenants were not, in fact, a couple, but failed to investigate this. 

This was important as the landlord only had a license to let to a single household. 

The agency failed to meet its obligations under Paragraphs 11b and 11g of the TPO Code. The Ombudsman also found that Hawks failed to flag to the landlord that the tenants were paying rent in advance and specifically in order to pass referencing, contrary to Paragraph 11g of the Code.

The Ombudsman also supported a complaint about Hawks Properties’ handling of the insurance claim. 

It was found to be fair, in the circumstances, for the agent to compensate the landlord on the basis that the claim had succeeded. This was because the agent had admitted being at fault for the error which led to the claim being denied, and the agent did not provide signed terms of business limiting their liability in the event the claim was unsuccessful.

The Ombudsman made an award of £9,264.50 for financial loss, and £1,000 for aggravation distress and inconvenience, a total of £10,264.50 but Hawks Properties Limited failed to pay the award.

Hawks Properties Limited was referred to the scheme’s independent Compliance Committee, which ruled that they should be excluded from The Property Ombudsman scheme.

As part of TPO’s compliance process, notification of this expulsion has been shared with all relevant bodies, including both Local and National Trading Standards for further investigation, as well as all property portals. 

The memorandum of understanding between TPO and the Property Redress Scheme prevents agents from registering with the other scheme until outstanding awards have been paid to consumers.

According to Companies House the company is in liquidation.

 

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Lettings and leasehold issues dominate TPO workload...
The illegal eviction took place in February 2024....
Activists claim “high levels of non-compliance by letting agents”...
Three lettings agencies have been expelled by TPO...
It now progresses to the so-called Report Stage....
The BoE has come to a decision on interest rates...
The House of Lords committee stage now continues until May...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
RICS has been embroiled in controversies in recent years....
Many agents remain uncertain about where they stand...
Sponsored Content
With less than a month to go until the UK...
The UK government has implemented 16 financial sanctions rule changes...
The owners of the Rentman software application (for property Lettings...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here