Tenants skip food and heat to pay rent, claims industry group

Tenants skip food and heat to pay rent, claims industry group


Todays other news


The Deposit Protection Service’s charitable foundation claims that a significant proportion of tenants who have recently moved are cutting back on food and heating to meet new, higher rents.

Some 32% of the 2,210 tenants who responded to The DPS’ survey in March said they’d moved during the previous 12 months, with 72% of movers saying they are paying higher rents at their new homes.

Almost three quarters of those tenants who had moved to more expensive rental properties said that they’ve been forced to reduce expenditure on essentials like food and heating to meet their new payments.

And 90% of the same group said that higher rents meant that they were less able to save money towards a mortgage deposit, with 89% saying that they were struggling to put money aside ‘for a rainy day.’

The survey also revealed that 49% of movers whose rent had increased had taken on a second job to meet the increased payments.

DPS managing director Matt Trevett says: “Rent reviews allow landlords or letting agents to adjust the rate to reflect any new cost pressures. The tenancy agreement should set out when these can take place.

“We’d encourage tenants to be open with prospective landlords about what they can reasonably afford to pay and for landlords to explain the rationale behind any increased rents at the outset.

“An open dialogue is crucial to preventing misunderstandings and can help avoid disputes.”

Some 65% of respondents who had moved over the previous 12 months said that their rent had increased by up to 30%, with 8% saying it had gone up by more than 50%.

The data also revealed that 14% of movers said they’d had to offer more than the listed rental price to secure a property.

Of those, 9% said they had offered more than 21% of the listed price, with more than a quarter (26%) saying they’d offered between 11% and 20% in excess.

And 35% of movers reported they’d had to relocate further from their place of work than they’d wanted, 36% said that they’d had to rent in a cheaper area and 39% said they’d had to downsize.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS) has expanded its Apex27 CRM...
A warning has been issued that lettings agencies could lose...
A prominent figure in the lettings industry is warning that...
Propertymark says stricter rules for EPC ratings in the private...
The Welsh Government is backing the call for a 'compensation'...
There will be a greater emphasis on digitisation....
A consultation document is being released today....
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Andrews Property Group is under charitable ownership...
New tenancies in England and Wales are at their lowest...
The Scottish system would differ from the UK system in...
Sponsored Content
Tenants want a place they can call home—somewhere comfortable, safe,...
Letting agencies face the dual challenge of keeping both landlords...

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

No one likes pop-ups ...
But while you're here