Six agencies expelled from The Property Ombudsman 

Six agencies expelled from The Property Ombudsman 


Todays other news
Lloyds has become a big Build To Rent player...
The business will be part of John Shepherd, Lomond's local...
This week's announcement is just the start...
It's a franchise resale by Belvoir...
The franchise giant has reported latest figures to its shareholders...

Six property businesses have been expelled from The Property Ombudsman after failing to pay compensation awards.

TPO found that Brimar Lettings & Management Ltd; Edward Clark Estates; Hunter Ashley Sales & Lettings; Eight Asset Management (EightAM); Skampi and Inspired Sales & Lettings had all failed to pay compensation awarded to consumers.

Advertisement

Chief Ombudsman Lesley Horton says: “We exist to provide a fair and independent route to resolve disputes with property businesses. Our decisions are binding on our members.

Advertisement

“Expulsion is always a last resort and follows a robust compliance process. The overwhelming majority of our members comply with our decisions and pay awards promptly. 

Advertisement

“Where businesses fail to do so, we will take appropriate action to protect consumers and uphold standards within the sector.”

TPO decisions are binding on registered businesses. 

Advertisement

Brimar Lettings & Management Ltd – Brimar Lettings & Management Ltd on Plungington Road, Preston, Lancashire, was the subject of a complaint from a landlord who said he had not received rent collected by the agent.

Advertisement

The Ombudsman found that £950 in rent had been paid by the tenant but not passed on to the landlord. An award of £350 was made for aggravation and inconvenience due to the agent’s poor communication. A total of £1,300 was awarded to the landlord.

Edward Clark Estates – Edward Clark Estates, on Orsett Road, Grays, Essex, was ordered to pay £150 to a tenant after failing to respond to a formal complaint. The Ombudsman supported the complaint on the basis that the tenant had received no response to their concerns. An award of £150 was made but was not paid by the company.

Hunter Ashley Sales & Lettings – Hunter Ashley Sales & Lettings on Brunel Way, Slough, was the subject of a complaint from a landlord who said the agent had received more than £12,000 in rent but had not transferred the funds.

Evidence reviewed by the Ombudsman included bank statements from the former tenant and the agent’s own statements issued to the landlord. The agent did not respond to the formal complaint and did not engage with the Ombudsman during the investigation.

The complaint was upheld and the agent was directed to pay an award of £12,635.

Inspired Sales & Lettings – A landlord complained that Inspired Sales & Lettings on High Street, Rushden, Northamptonshire, arranged a new Tenancy Agreement without obtaining their consent and then charged fees for both a let-only service and property management that the landlord had never agreed to.

The Ombudsman upheld the complaint, finding clear breaches of the Code of Practice for Residential Letting Agents, and awarded the landlord £834 in compensation. This comprised of a £570 let-only fee refund, £114 management fee refund, and £150 for aggravation, distress and inconvenience.

Skampi – A landlord complained that Skampi, based on Peregrine Road in Ilford, Essex, stopped forwarding rental payments, leaving them without any rent income for several months. The Ombudsman upheld the complaint and ordered Skampi to pay a total of £5,132.92, covering rent owed, overpaid management fee refunds and compensation. 

A payment plan was set up and the agent paid the landlord £1,882.92, but no further payments were received leaving £3,250 outstanding.

Eight Asset Management (EightAM) – A leaseholder brought a complaint against Eight Asset Management, on Edinburgh Way in Harlow, Essex, concerning its management of a residential leasehold property. 

The complaint covered five areas: the agent withheld available information that had been requested; maintenance work was carried out without proper authorisation; lack of communication regarding a parking matter; unreasonable delays in providing information about CCTV; and inadequate complaints handling.

The Ombudsman found in favour of the leaseholder after identifying repeated communication shortcomings by the agent and awarded £250.

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Letting Agent Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Penalty notice sign and gavel on wooden desk for legal enforcement.
Propertymark says this in its responses to two council consultations...
For rent sign in front of a blurred house, real estate rental advertisement.
That’s the view of Propertymark in its latest rental market...
Team of letting agents collaborating around a table in an office setting.
The event was held in collaboration with the Guild of...
Businessman analyzing real estate market trends with digital graphs.
The RICS market snapshot is a measure of agent sentiment...
Landlords are selling up and rents are rising as a...
This is apparent in the prime lettings segment, it's claimed...
More details will be released by the government later this...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Lloyds has become a big Build To Rent player...
The business will be part of John Shepherd, Lomond's local...
This week's announcement is just the start...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.