x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.

In the Community

Jonathan Rolande

JONATHAN ROLANDE: Buying and selling is too...

Lots of things change in the property sector -...

icon

Be the first to comment

Graham Norwood

Changes to Renters Reform Bill after Easter...

The government has written to Conservative MPs promising changes...

icon

Baffled how the legal system was not reviewed at any point over the last 5 years??!! The 6 month tenancy (then periodic) does cut down on renewal admin however it will also certainly see an increase in just 6 month tenancies. As every agent incurs costs and charges landlords for each tenancy this in turn will result in rents increasing. Unintended consequence perhaps.

Greg Bjorg

re: renovation and problems with it ...

My first self-repair did not end too well. I...

icon

Be the first to comment

Graham Norwood

Changes to Renters Reform Bill after Easter...

The government has written to Conservative MPs promising changes...

icon

The NRLA are anti landlord by agreeing to removal of S21 WITHOUT asking their members what they think about this. IF they would have had the courtesy to ask, then they would have known the vast majority of landlords want to keep S21. They would also have realised, that many landlord properties will be sold because of no S21. When an organisation you pay to keep in business, welcomes something which is damaging/hostile to your business then it is time to cut ties. Ben if you are reading this, I would like a response from you.......Crickets.

Lee Dahill

PR power: Top tips to launch successful...

The world of PR can feel like a crowded...

icon

Be the first to comment

Karl Knipe

The pros and cons of student accommodation...

Some property investors are put off student accommodation by...

icon

Great information!!

Angels Media

FUTURE: PROPERTY TECH ...

Join us to network, learn & share idea's with...

icon

Be the first to comment

Graham Norwood

This is how much investor buyers can...

New research claims investors who buy at auction can...

icon

Be the first to comment

Graham Norwood

Lender hires TV property guru to highlight...

Homes Under The Hammer property expert Lucy Alexander is...

icon

This article highlights what we already know. A waste of buildings on an enormous scale. Are there any similar statistics for Wales?

Steph Rady

INTERIOR DESIGN TRENDS TO EXPECT IN 2017:...

Kicking off 2017, we’ve predicted stabilisation in the property...

icon

Be the first to comment

Martin Gibbon

First Time Buyers Underestimating the Cost of...

The majority of aspiring first-time buyers ‘wildly’ underestimate how...

icon

roof repairs ipswitch

Sell your home this summer - House...

Summer is just around the corner. And, contrary to...

icon

Be the first to comment

Nat Daniels

Got lots to say about property? You're...

Here is your opportunity to get all your latest property-related...

icon

2.8 million new instructions- who wants some? While preparing a submission for the at the time unannounced CLG inquiry in PRS (CLG only told their friends) I did some number crunching in the hope of adding a positive input into a department that is seemingly bereft of any experience of the Private rented sector and almost allergic to anyone who has. I identified that a 100,000 tenancy provision by private landlords into the assisted tenancy market (pensions and benefits) was worth approaching £1 billion to landlords. One hundred thousand tenancies was a deliberately small percentage ; an easy , appropriately sized sample to make the point rather than a scientifically calculated figure. It represented about 1.4% of the middle ground between PRS and social housing that many agencies and landlords steer clear of. Subsequent research (discussion) shows that about 40% of assisted tenants are no worse at paying their rent than anyone else. Essentially what that means is that there is an additional £28 billion rental opportunity for those prepared to engage the sector. Increasing the PRS provision by up to by 70% is surely a good start in solving the housing crisis. It will obviously put a large rental income in the pocket of those who can afford to buy to rent out, it will put a large commission income in the pockets of those servicing the industry but moreover it will add the incentive to have another 2.8 million private rented sector properties available to ease the housing crisis. Obviously that will leave the remaining 60% of the sector to house but it seems reasonable that government doesn’t attempt to privatise their entire housing obligation, such schemes tend to lead to civil unrest. There will be natural envy at the rich seemingly exploiting the poor, I am not getting into the social ethics of a solution, simply suggesting how a set of government departments could set about solving issues in an industry they don’t properly understand.

MovePal MovePal MovePal