x
By using this website, you agree to our
use of cookies
to enhance your experience.
SEARCH
Search
STAY
CONNECTED!
Sign in
Sign in
New here? Sign up
Feedback
My Account
Feedback
Sign out
×
Make Today's Website as home page
Menu
Estate agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Letting agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Landlord today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Investor today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Introducer today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Jobs Today
Home
Find a Job
Search Recruiters
Recruiters
New
Chris's
Personal Profile
View my company profile
Chris Parkinson
1278
Profile Views
About Me
Send message
View company profile
Follow all comments made
my expertise in the industry
Chris's wall
Chris's
Recent Activity
Shelter should have been blasting the government over the indiscriminate, overblown eviction ban. Smaller landlords have either been hit hard, like myself, by those exploiting the ban, or seen the contempt with which landlords are viewed and treated. It has become obvious that it is now very high risk, low gain. This government has refused to pay compensation to those who have been battered by malicious tenants. Many landlords have simply decided to 'chuck it'.
From:
Chris Parkinson
19 November 2021 10:17 AM
One more thing. The aforementioned campaigners are too spineless to react when told about their folly. They haven't got the integrity to face their victims. These are the people who have the government's ear. Are you listening Jenrick, Buckland? Are any of you listening? Are you going to admit responsibility when the lettings market is all but destroyed. Are you going to explain this to the genuine would-be tenants.
From:
Chris Parkinson
16 November 2020 11:33 AM
We keep hearing about forthcoming exemptions for egregious cases but they never materialise. If Buckland , Jenrick or Johnson were losing money because of this, there would be no hesitation. I'm sick of hearing campaigners raging about nasty old landlords, without acknowledging the fact that their demands are protecting downright thieves.
From:
Chris Parkinson
16 November 2020 11:22 AM
I agree, but for one small detail. I can see why responsibilities should return even a few hundred thousand per year. It has been argued though that it is hard to justify paying more than the traditional superstar, the brain or heart surgeon. However, salaries of several million per year may be a little excessive. Especially when these reward kicking a ball around a lawn or diving a gas-guzzling car around a track for a couple of hours every two weeks.
From:
Chris Parkinson
11 November 2020 12:56 PM
Those who seek to rent because they can't afford to buy, so like to blame landlords for their situation. 1. They can't afford the deposit, so they can't buy. That's the landlords' fault. 2. Rents are high. That's greedy landlords. Sorry chums but . . . 1. Mortgage lenders do not trust anyone and are not prepared to take a risk. THAT's why you need a deposit. Not because landlord's dictate. 2. Rents may be higher than they need to be because of the liabilities and burdens placed on landlords.
From:
Chris Parkinson
11 November 2020 12:45 PM
I'll be quiet now.
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 16:02 PM
Mind you, this is a good way of advertising. Anyone out there know someone who wants to buy a two bedroom, so-called cottage with garage, private parking, workshop, garden etc.? Available as soon as the parasite has been extricated.
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 16:00 PM
Seriously though, she hasn't even got a car. She doesn't have a woodworking hobby or weld things to put in town centres. The whole place is completely wasted on her. They talk about doing this to stop homelessness. I don't suppose she's allowing some poor wretch to sleep in the spare bedroom.
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 15:56 PM
Sorry Paul, I missed this. I've only just seen it. I hang my head in shame. I'm not familiar yet how the reply-edit-like bit works. I'm new to this.
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 15:48 PM
There will be one benefit for those who choose to carry on letting. The places will be so scarce, rents could rise significantly. No doubt Bungle will enjoy avoiding that issue. He will conclude that: "Erm, landlords will erm be erm, er ABSOLUTELY! ... to blame for this"
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 10:27 AM
Well, no doubt they will have a lot of fun trying to work it out. Undoubtedly, some will. Then they can try explaining it to their MPs. That will be the real challenge. Hopefully this will haunt them when they're competing for the few remaining lets.
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 09:45 AM
Great opportunities for renters, part 2. If you feel really adventurous, you can move on and let it to a complete stranger. The conditions will be much stricter and there will be serious liabilities. However, you will enjoy the total respect of the tenants because they will appreciate your providing them with an affordable home.
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 09:04 AM
Great opportunities for renters. You are about to see a wave of houses for sale. All you need to exercise your right-to-buy, is about £20,000 to use as a deposit*. This is because mortgage lenders don't trust anyone and are not prepared to take any risks. You will need about £2,000 to pay solicitors, surveyors etc. Well you need to protect your investment. You will then have the responsibility of dealing with all of those issues, such as roof leaks, electrical safety, plumbing, smoke and fire alarms, subsidence, the list goes on. This can be expensive but that's no problem. *This is for a fairly modest house Unless it is in an expensive area, in which case, double it.
From:
Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 09:03 AM
Yes, I'll certainly be out of the game as soon as possible. The tenants taking their revenge, as I'm sure they see it, are often too cowardly to face it. Mine definitely is. If only I could confront her to ask WHY? What have I done, other than provide a two bedroom house with a garden, off-street parking, a secure garage, with power and lighting, a large secure workshop, also with power and lighting, for just £475 per month?
From:
Chris Parkinson
02 September 2020 14:25 PM
My house is being seized by this government, to provide housing for someone who is not only refusing to pay, despite working, but refusing to respond to attempts at communication. Meanwhile, I'm renting house. I can't use equity from my house as a deposit to buy for myself. Politicians supporting holus-bolus, this ill-conceived, blunt instrument, are showing that they are mere glory seekers. Why can't they explain why belligerent tenants shouldn't be deprived of this shield?
From:
Chris Parkinson
01 September 2020 15:22 PM
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Breaking News
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Video Archieve
Today 14:58
Portal Discussions
Joined Group From: Your Community
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Conversation Comment in: Interior Design
Today 14:58
×
Send a message
Message
×
Write on Wall
Message
×
Send a message
Reply to:
Message
Breaking News
Propertymark guide helps tenants complain and challenge rent rises
Boost for Buy To Let as mortgage product choice improves
Big HMRC fines for agents prompt Anti-Money Laundering guidance
Backing for Ground Rent Cap being announced this week
Agents urged to attend Equality and Cultural Awareness event
Get On With It - major agency tells government to reform renting
Grow Your Lettings Agency - free webinar this week
Rent Controls - Call by Labour MPs in defiance of party policy
Regulation of Property Agents - government slammed by Lords
Independent agency runs seminar series for new landlords
Chris's Recent Activity
From: Chris Parkinson
19 November 2021 10:17 AM
From: Chris Parkinson
16 November 2020 11:33 AM
From: Chris Parkinson
16 November 2020 11:22 AM
From: Chris Parkinson
11 November 2020 12:56 PM
From: Chris Parkinson
11 November 2020 12:45 PM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 16:02 PM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 16:00 PM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 15:56 PM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 15:48 PM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 10:27 AM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 09:45 AM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 09:04 AM
From: Chris Parkinson
03 September 2020 09:03 AM
From: Chris Parkinson
02 September 2020 14:25 PM
From: Chris Parkinson
01 September 2020 15:22 PM