x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

Agents and landlords are being warned about a scam, whereby phoney tenants take out tenancies in blocks of flats where post is delivered and left in communal areas.

The fake tenant then goes through the occupants’ post, stealing their IDs and using their credit cards and banks to buy expensive goods.

The fraudulent tenant is likely to have produced convincing ID checks and references, fooling the agent or landlord, and to have paid the deposit and advance rent without trouble.

However, the tenant’s ID will have been stolen and the money will have been paid via a debit or credit card belonging to someone else.

Tom Costley, of Barlow Costley agents in Swinton, Lancashire, was recently hit by such a scam.

“I did not believe there was any problem when I moved the tenant into a property in early December,” he said. “There was certainly no problem with the references.

“The first I knew anything was wrong was when I got a call from police to say they had found a set of keys belonging to my agency during a raid on another property, about ten miles away in Bury.”

During that raid, police apparently discovered a large number of high-worth items, including iPads and iPhones, apparently all bought with stolen credit and debit cards, and awaiting export where they would be sold abroad.

The keys were returned by the police to the agent who identified them as belonging to the flat he had let.

Barlow Costley was then approached by the tenant in question, who asked for another set of keys, claiming to have lost the first. But when told by the agents that the police wished to speak to him, he fled in a taxi and has apparently not been seen since. The police investigation is ongoing.

In the block of flats concerned, the fake tenant had managed to steal the identities of three of the six occupants, much to their distress.

Barlow Costley has also since been approached by the debit card company and told that the ‘tenant’ had paid via a stolen debit card, and that the true holder had noticed the large sum of money going out of their account and wanted it refunding.

At the block of flats itself, Barlow Costley had to put a 14-day abandonment notice on the flat concerned and change all the locks.

Costley has been told the incident was almost certainly part of a huge and widespread fraud where the modus operandi is for the fake tenant to enter into a tenancy in the usual way for a flat, furnished or unfurnished, arousing no suspicions. However, the tenant generally stays only for one or two nights, leaving as soon as he or she has accomplished their true purpose.

“Apparently this is going on all over the place and is a very smooth set-up,” said Costley.

Fortunately, in this case, Barlow Costley had organised comprehensive cover for their landlord, who will not be out of pocket as a result.

Costley is uncertain whether this particular incident could have been prevented in view of his firm’s already tight procedures but he has now tightened them up even more.

He said: “We now insist that anyone who wants to pay by debit card or credit card must come to our office to do so. If we have them in front of us, then we will be covered by the card providers’ insurance. We also absolutely insist on photo ID and will make no exceptions.”

Michael Portman, managing director of the specialist firm Let Insurance Services, which covered the landlord in this particular instance, said he is getting anecdotal information from across the UK of a rising number of deliberate fraud cases.

He said applicants fill out tenancy application forms fraudulently as they move from property to property, with no intention of keeping up with the rent. It is not unknown for this to happen within the same small town.
 
He said fraudulent tenants often give false information on where they have been living previously to throw referencing companies and letting agents off the trail. He added that they are also very difficult to evict as they seem to know their way around the legal system.
 
Portman said: “Tenant fraud is a growing problem for agents and landlords alike. It is essential that agents have a checklist for new tenants that includes obtaining ID documents and proof of current residency at an early stage of the tenancy application. 

“Agents need to be alert for anything unusual that could increase the risk for the landlord.”
 
He said that if agents had any doubts, they should talk to staff at letting insurance firms.

He said: “They are removed from personal contact with the prospective tenant and are trained to spot anomalies, oddities and the potential for fraud in tenancy applications.”

Comments

  • icon

    lol..when the btl market finally implodes,'landlords' will be taking anyone with a pulse

    as for cash being 'money laundering' thats just a government term.The real money laundering is going on in central london and seems to be welcomed.

    for the record...cash is real and everything else is virtual

    no wonder my kids want to leave the country and personally don't blame them..the 'species known as youth' are being treated like fools and atms

    • 27 January 2012 14:01 PM
  • icon

    There are hundreds of agents who fail to do proper checks on landlords, let alone tenants, and fail to take any ID and fail to use Land Registry information as they don't see the need to do so.

    They are on borrowed time as sooner or later they will get stung!

    • 26 January 2012 19:04 PM
  • icon

    See how the government have brainwashed you into pressuming that cash must be from money laundering. What complete rubbish. And you actually pay them to police for them.

    • 26 January 2012 12:03 PM
  • icon

    @michael saville
    confirm we have money laundering checks in place and maximum amounts accepted etc.

    • 26 January 2012 11:07 AM
  • icon

    The 'so called old fashioned' cheque, from the same bank that the monthly rent S/O or D/D will be taken from, is the safest thing .
    Just wait until the cheque is cleared (allow five days) before check-in and releasing keys etc.
    No, because tenant wants occupation earlier than five days? This in MOST cases should gently ring alarm bells.
    In my view if the suitability checks and proper adminstration take less than that time, short cuts are being taken

    • 26 January 2012 10:12 AM
  • icon

    What would really rub salt into the wounds would be if the tenant then sued Barlow Costley for unlawful eviction under PFE Act 1977 for changing the locks!!

    On a more serious note and not wishing to sound critical with hindsight which can always make you look clever but if this 'tenant' then came into the office why did the agent tell them the police wanted to talk to them? As they were bound to scarper as they already knew they were guilty.

    Why didn't the agent make them a cup of tea and ask them to wait while they went to the local locksmith to get the new keys cut, meanwhile calling the police as soon as they left the office. My guess is Plod would have been there in the time it took to cut the keys and an arrest could have been made.

    Seems a bit odd to tell a known crook that the police would like to have a chat with them!!

    With respect to Michael Portman (and any other insurer or referencing company with similar understandable views) a clever fraudster, a really well organised one, is almost impossible to detect until after the event unless they trip themselves up with a really silly mistake or too much greed - like trying it on several times in the same small town, which is daft.

    The really clever ones are not daft, and unlike this case do not leave evidence lying around and have almost always flown the coop by the time the Law catches up with them.

    Also interest just what loss the Landlord has suffered in this case as they had the December rent, the deposit presumably covers January (unless DPS won't release it!!) there has been no damage, just the cost of new keys, hurt pride and a lesson learned. Presumably the flat has been re-let

    • 26 January 2012 10:08 AM
  • icon

    Cash? Fraudsters will love that... No Money laundering policy? Agreed on credit cards though. That's a big no no

    • 26 January 2012 06:45 AM
  • icon

    Although it would not necessarily stop this type of fraudulent activity, we insist on the first payment either by cash or bank transfer. I would always be concerned by a tenant who pays their deposit and first months rent by credit card - surely they are effectively already in debt!

    • 26 January 2012 02:44 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal