We have 92 guests online
Twitter Facebook Linked In Youtube Pinterest Sign up
New agent-owned portal is planned by top names in industry     More competition in tenancy deposit schemes welcomed by minister     Immigrant checks would be 'light touch', Prisk promises     Lettings portal is rapped by advertising watchdog     Large-scale investment needed in private rental sector    

Complaints balloon about tenancy deposits, says Shelter

Thursday 28th June 2012

Shelter says that calls to its helpline from private tenants with concerns about how their deposits are being protected have ballooned by more than 80% in the last two years.

The charity says the average deposit needed to move into a privately rented home is £979, and that having a deposit withheld when a tenancy ends can push people into debt and make it difficult for them to move to another property without the money for a new deposit.

Landlords who fail to place their tenants’ deposit in one of three authorised schemes within 30 days of a tenancy starting can be taken to court. They could face a penalty of one to three times the value of the deposit, which is then awarded to the tenant.

Shelter chief executive Campbell Robb said: “It is extremely worrying that we have seen such a huge rise in problems with tenancy deposits at a time when privately renting is no longer just a stepping stone to something better, but a long-term reality for more and more families.

“While we know that most landlords do the right thing, some cause absolute misery for their tenants, accusing them of owing thousands of pounds for damage that doesn’t exist, or falsely claiming to have protected their deposit and then never returning it.”

Shelter is urging all tenants to make sure their deposit is protected by using its three-minute online checker.


Added by A on 2012-09-03 19:24:47

I viewed a property and put down a deposit and paid the agency fee for references on Friday to have the property taken off the market. I signed an agreement form outlining how much was left to pay on the day I moved in. Today the agency contacted me to say that the landlady (I've never met) now wants to DOUBLE the damage deposit, despite the fact I entered an agreement based on an agreed one month damage deposit which was also extensively advertised as such online. This would mean a deposit of £1500 plus a month's rent. Is this landlady greed or the agency pulling a fast one? Is this even legal?
Added by Ray Evans on 2012-06-30 16:13:08

"and that having a deposit withheld when a tenancy ends can push people into debt"

Withheld? Under current legislation/procedures deposits cannot be returned until both landlord and tenant agree. That cannot be completed until the tenant has vacated - so the existing deposit is not available until after 'check-out' We are where we are.

Again, ill thought through legislation.

Simples!

Added by Hawkeye on 2012-06-30 09:55:07

Don’t know what they are bleating on about as tenant deposits have always been in place and this begs the question 'so what’s new'.

@David tries to make a point but the alternative is even more complaints and many more problems with tenants not getting their deposit returned.

The system is a pain but it just about works right up to when you use the arbitration service of the DPS which is rap with a silent C.

I agree with the first post - shelter should stop moaning and become a landlord and see how damned difficult it can be with DSS tenants not paying rent , trashing property and then demanding their deposit back.
Added by David on 2012-06-29 13:50:24

Perhaps it should be considered if, in light of the rising complaints about deposit protection, we should scrap deposit laws as they are no working?
Added by Ray Comer on 2012-06-29 13:08:08

I question their figures - 80% increase in calls doesn't mean that there is an 80% increase in genuine complaints.

I'd give them a little more credit if it wasn't for the blind devotion so many of their staff have towards proving their tenant is right, no matter what the evidence to the contrary may say.
Added by Not a Shelter Fan on 2012-06-28 13:02:53

Yet another attack on Landlords by Shelter. No doubt they would like the Scottish laws extended to England and Wales so tenants do not have to pay for credit checks, additional copies of tenancy agreements etc. I am surprised they think tenants should even pay rent!

If Shelter are so brilliant why do they not become landlords themselves and show us all how it should be done. After all they seem to think it is so easy . . .
Post Comments
Please login to post comments.
Email:
Password:
Forgot Password
Post Comments without Login
To prevent spam,please type in result 10 + 4 =
 


DISCLAIMER:The views contained in these user comments are not endorsed by Letting Agent Today(nor its associates and advertisers) in any way and are provided by users who wish to publish their independent opinions on our news.Whilst every effort is made to moderate these comments,due to the instant nature of the posting not all offensive material can be removed instantly.Please help us keep the comments areas tidy by reporting details of any infringements to team@lettingagenttoday.co.uk
Feedback:
If you have any questions or suggestions about this article or our news section, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Editorial Contact Details - Rosalind Renshaw
rosalind.renshaw@gmail.com
0845 075 0152
Related News Stories
Most Read News Stories