x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

Rental deposits are now protected in Scotland, as from yesterday – with the large majority of tenants completely unaware of the new requirement.

A survey showed that 63% do not know about tenancy deposit protection.

Three schemes, The Letting Protection Service Scotland, Safedeposits Scotland, and My|deposits Scotland, have now begun receiving deposits.

The legislation is retrospective, meaning that existing deposits where there are ongoing tenancies must be protected, alongside deposits for new tenancy agreements.

Unlike England and Wales, all three schemes in Scotland are ‘custodial’ – ie, physically accepting money. They are not allowed to protect it via insurance.

Landlords and letting agencies must also begin providing ‘prescribed’ information to tenants.

Landlords and agents can start voluntarily submitting deposits for protection now, but must be complicit by November.

It has been predicted that with the need to hand over deposits that were retrospective, some letting agents will go out of business.

It is also thought that large numbers of letting agents and private landlords in Scotland are unprepared for the dispute process, and in particular unprepared in terms of inventories.

Pinstripe Inventories says that ‘hundreds’ of agents and landlords have left themselves exposed to losing out in disputes.

The company says it has had a substantial increase in calls from letting agents concerned that their existing inventories are not robust enough.

Dominic Bargeton, managing director of Pinstripe Inventories, said: “Up to now, inventories have often been prepared in-house or by one-man bands. Many are not worth the paper they are written on.”

Comments

  • icon

    Industry obese is a Morris dancer. Bet that makes this sham website take notice if England is going to be offended. Idiot.

    • 07 July 2012 02:52 AM
  • icon

    LAT. Please remove posts that contain disrespectful names about groups of people. I refer to industry observers post.

    It's neither funny or clever.

    • 06 July 2012 10:38 AM
  • icon

    Agreed - one reason being too many unnecessary TDP schemes.

    One scheme is all that is needed, one Custodial scheme. That way any tenant losing out to a defunct agent gets their money back.

    Still amazed the Jocks were so foolish as to go multiple schemes. This isn't about Consumer Choice (as the Landlord decides where the money is protected anyway) it is about Consumer Protection

    • 03 July 2012 08:43 AM
  • icon

    ......and not all tenants/landlords south of the border know.

    • 03 July 2012 08:32 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal