x
By using this website, you agree to our
use of cookies
to enhance your experience.
SEARCH
Search
STAY
CONNECTED!
Sign in
Sign in
New here? Sign up
Feedback
My Account
Feedback
Sign out
×
Make Today's Website as home page
Menu
Estate agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Letting agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Landlord today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Investor today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Introducer today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Jobs Today
Home
Find a Job
Search Recruiters
Recruiters
New
Steven's
Personal Profile
View my company profile
Steven Spowart
845
Profile Views
About Me
Send message
View company profile
Follow all comments made
my expertise in the industry
Steven 's wall
Steven 's
Recent Activity
Maybe shelter should try actually living up to their name and prevent rather than increase homelessness. No way I would ever donate to this lot of clowns. They need to start purchasing properties and letting them to homeless people. Maybe when they start getting properties wrecked they will stop slagging off landlords. If section 21 goes, I sell up, and I have yet to evict without good reason. I wouldnt sell if I had a sitting tenant unless I was forced to for example by a lender, or large service charge bill. I would however use the section 21 rights in order to reduce my costs and time evicting a non paying tenant, although in practice I only actually used this once against a drug dealer who wasnt paying. It is the landlord that then has to clean up the mess left behind by previous tenants, this takes time and money. Any mandatory 3 or 5 year tenancy will mean I will not have another tenant, and will sell when any existing tenant move out. The risk of making it much more difficult to remove a bad tenant is simply too great. Good luck getting all those tenants into either the purchase or social sector. Their are hardly any properties left in the social sector thanks to Maggie Thatchers right to buy policy, and even if all landlords sold their entire portfolios the cost of purchasing a property would still be far too high for a lot of tenants. This would ultimately cause an increase in homelessness. Wait, arnt shelter supposed to be reducing homelessness, seems they have their donors wrapped round their finger under false pretences doesn't it.
From:
Steven Spowart
05 August 2017 18:35 PM
As a landlord myself, I agree with a ban on letting agent fees to tenants. The landlord can just choose a different agent if the fees are too high, the tenant will have to choose the one that has a suitable property. They should still be allowed to charge for referencing, although this could be deducted from the first months rent. This would stop the landlord having to pay for lots of referencing only to have the tenant go elsewhere anyway. With regards to leashehold charges, any bill to stop unreasonable charges is long overdue. My local council slapped me a bill for over £25K to have the walls re-cladded. a) I didnt ask them to do it, in fact I said I didnt want it and they did it anyway. b) The price far exceeds the value of the works they did, I had the place surveyed and the surveyor put a figure of more like £8K. c) That figure came to 20% of the value of my property. I didnt put that much down as a mortgage deposit and they asked me to pay within 28 days. I refused to pay a penny until the price has been significantly reduced, and am now in a legal battle with them. This has made me seriously consider throwing my tenants on to the street with a section 21, and selling up which I didnt want to do, and franctly why should I sell just because of un reasonable service charges. My flat is in a block of 4, and the other 3 are still local authority owned. There should be a limit to what can be charged to a lease without unanimous approval of the work going ahead. They didnt even tell me how much I was going to have to pay until the bill dropped through the door. Once this legal battle is over I intend to push to have the head of my councils housing department removed from her post for this.
From:
Steven Spowart
26 March 2017 00:08 AM
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Breaking News
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Video Archieve
Today 14:58
Portal Discussions
Joined Group From: Your Community
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Conversation Comment in: Interior Design
Today 14:58
×
Send a message
Message
×
Write on Wall
Message
×
Send a message
Reply to:
Message
Breaking News
Renters Reform Bill “still misses the mark” says Propertymark
Tax Alert - Agents can urge landlord clients to take part in pilot scheme
Toxic attitude to Private Renting may now change, hopes lettings chief
Renters Reform Bill - groups still lobbying for further changes
Build To Rent claims it already conforms with Reform Bill ideals
Gove hits back at critics after Renters Reform Bill wins key vote
PropTech tool will help eviction process under Renters Reform Bill changes
More tenants borrowing to fund deposits on next property - claim
Rental market back to normal in Prime Central London says agency
Agents proud of the industry…not so keen on the system
Steven 's Recent Activity
From: Steven Spowart
05 August 2017 18:35 PM
From: Steven Spowart
26 March 2017 00:08 AM