x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

The Council of Mortgage Lenders is backing attempts by landlords to get the Government to change its mind over how housing benefit is paid.

In last week’s second reading of the Welfare Reform Bill in the House of Lords, the Government re-stated its commitment to proposals to pay housing benefit directly to tenants as part of wider plans for welfare reform.

The Government believes that encouraging benefit recipients to take greater responsibility for managing their own financial affairs is a crucial part of its welfare reform initiative.

Landlords have repeatedly called for tenants to be given the right to choose whether to receive their housing benefit, or to have it paid direct to landlords.

Currently, Local Housing Allowance is paid directly to housing benefit tenants in private rental accommodation. The Government plans to do the same with the housing benefit element of the new Universal Credit, but this time social housing landlords will also lose out on not having rent paid direct.

Landlords have repeatedly complained that LHA tenants often fail to pass on their rent, choosing to spend it on other things. Landlord bodies say that as a result, landlords are leaving the social housing sector.

The CML said this week that lenders need to have their own mortgages repaid by social housing landlords, and this was underpinned by the certainty of them getting rent payments.

A recent survey of 1,000 tenants carried out by the research consultancy Policis, working with the National Housing Federation (NHF), found that 93% were in favour of the government paying rent directly to their landlord.

Meanwhile, in 2009, Shelter said that, among those claimants who would choose payments to be made directly to their landlords, 95% were struggling to manage their finances.

Organisations representing tenants, landlords and housing managers in both the social and private rented sectors, as well as lenders, have now joined together to support an amendment to the Bill that would enable benefit recipients to choose whether to receive their housing payment themselves or have it paid directly to their landlord. 

The CML said: “Making tenants responsible for their finances against their wishes imposes additional worries and concerns, and problems that may unnecessarily arise from an inability to cope. The Government needs to acknowledge this as it develops its proposals further.”

It added: “Lenders support tenants, consumer groups, landlords and managers in the social and private rented sectors in urging the government to let benefit recipients make rational decisions about what is in their own interests.”

Comments

  • icon

    Who is making these obviously daft laws, what are our representatives doing , allowing them to get through. Every DHS tenant that we have has managed to spend their benefits on other things than their rent, so we are thousands down, and so they have had to leave good accommodation, and they think they are being clever. We no longer take DHS because obviously they do not spend their money as contracted, not a single one of them. And to Paul, that is how our local council operates. You will never get that money back because the dosey CAB and legal aid solicitors will put forward a case that your poor tenant is suing you because of the black mould that they have created. It will take the best part of a year to get them out, but atleast you are getting paid direct now.

    • 22 September 2011 18:10 PM
  • icon

    Yesterday spoke with the local council about a tenant in arrears of 5 months and discovered that housing benefit is being paid to the tenant.

    The benefit has now been suspended and I have made an application to get this paid to my firm and I await with baited breath.

    I was advised it was suspended and could be paid to my firm as the tenant is more than 8 weeks in arrears.

    I will strugle to get the £3000+ arrears back and have started eviction proceedings.

    Anyone else had this offered to them by their council?

    • 22 September 2011 09:14 AM
  • icon

    In 35 years I only accepted one benifits tenant - over 8 months to obtain possession and that cost the landord 10 months lost rent and my management commisson.
    Never again.
    If the government want to provide private rental accommodation let them pay the landlord/agent direct with no 'clawback' strings attached etc. Why should the agent or landlord have to pay for defaults.

    • 22 September 2011 09:08 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal