x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button
award
award award
award award

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Government revises rental property minimum room size guidance

In an announcement made just hours before much of the industry started its Christmas break, the government has clarified its guidance on minimum room sizes.

Since October this year, rooms used for sleeping by one person over 10 years old have had to be at least  6.51 square metres, and those slept in by two people over 10 years old will have had to at least 10.22 square metres. 

Rooms slept in by children of 10 years and younger have had to be at least 4.64 square metres.

The Residential Landlords Association had raised concerns that the regulations could have led to landlords being in breach of the law where a pregnant tenant gave birth.

“Whilst the RLA believes that tenants should never face the dangers of overcrowded accommodation, it was concerned that the changes could have seen councils required to take action against landlords where a tenant gave birth and as a result there were two people in a room sized for one. A landlord who sought to evict in this scenario would be carrying out unlawful discrimination” says the association.

However the government has now cleared up the potential confusion with a guidance note issued on Friday afternoon.

The guidance says that in instances where a tenant has given birth to a child since moving into a House of Multiple Occupation, there is an expectation that local authorities will not be acting in the public interest if they commence a prosecution.

David Smith, RLA policy director, says: “We warmly welcome this new guidance. It reflects considerable work between the RLA and the government in addressing serious concerns about the consequences of the room size changes.

“The government has clearly listened to our concerns and this document should provide much greater assurances to landlords and tenants alike.”

  • icon

    Yes the council would not be acting in the publics interest, they never do. They would be acting in their own interest as usual, so expect prosecution, that you can win after appeal and a load of lawyers fees. On that note Merry Christmas all

  • James Hurst

    I have a room for a single adult that narrowly misses the minimum room size. Also in the house is a kitchen / diner, a communal lounge, a utility room and a storage room but that doesn’t make a difference. I will evict my tenant and she will have to move out of the area because she won’t be able to afford the rent on a bigger room. Seems like another well thought out law.

  • icon

    I needs to be common sense, if a person is happy with the room size, rent etc it’s common sense to allow them to rent it. If the room is too small they won’t be happy and won’t rent it simple

  • icon

    Will have to do some googling to find out does this apply only to HMO's or to all homes? We have a flat where bed 2 is 4.788m2.

    Looks like it only applies to HMO's . Luxurious yawn as we don't have any of those on our books .....

icon

Please login to comment

Zero Deposit Zero Deposit Zero Deposit
sign up