x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button
CORONAVIRUS UPDATE

See the latest Coronavirus statistics from across the world on our world map SEE MAP UK Confirmed cases: 281,661 | UK Deaths: 39,904 SEE MAP Italy Confirmed cases: 234,013 | Italy Deaths: 33,689 | Italy Recovered: 161,895 SEE MAP Spain Confirmed cases: 240,660 | Spain Deaths: 27,133 | Spain Recovered: 150,376 SEE MAP See the latest Coronavirus statistics from across the world on our world map SEE MAP UK Confirmed cases: 281,661 | UK Deaths: 39,904 SEE MAP Italy Confirmed cases: 234,013 | Italy Deaths: 33,689 | Italy Recovered: 161,895 SEE MAP Spain Confirmed cases: 240,660 | Spain Deaths: 27,133 | Spain Recovered: 150,376 SEE MAP

award
award award
award award

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

County courts still "overwhelmed" by landlords' possession orders

Eviction specialists at Landlord Action say county courts are still overwhelmed by the number of possession claims being put forward, a year on from when the problem was originally spotted.

The firm says the problem is now actually worsening because of the use of call centres run by inexperienced temporary staff.  

In a recent routine phone call to follow up a case, an operator informed Landlord Action’s head of legal Julie Herbert that there were just six people in one call centre dealing with calls and paperwork relating to 55 different courts. 

“It’s evident that those at the call centre are not qualified to be able to differentiate between correspondence that can sit on a file, and correspondence that needs the urgent attention of a judge in order for a case to progress. We have had numerous incidents where court staff appear to be opening post, filing it and doing little about it, adding to the problem even further” says Herbert.

Landlord Action has expressed concern that more planned court closures and the introduction of the recent Deregulation Act, will likely see a surge in more defended, contentious cases clogging up the system and resulting in even longer delays.

“When correspondence is received by the court, it needs to be looked at by someone who is capable of deciding whether the item of correspondence requires any action. If they are going to close courts, they need to transfer some of those qualified members of staff to these call centres. Alternatively, train up more qualified staff so that they have a legal understanding of each item of correspondence which the court receives.  It can then be processed saving numerous calls from practitioners chasing them up” says Herbert.

She claims that a high volume of tenants’ applications have no merit. However, some applications are being processed by office staff, where hearings are being set down weeks after a possession order has been granted, causing further losses to landlords and putting a strain on court resources. 

“If judges actually got to see these applications in the first instance, decisions could be made on most without the need for a hearing” she says.

In the interim, Landlord Action’s advice to other practitioners who are waiting for a reply from the courts on anything, is to carry out regular chase up calls, even more so than normal.  

“If told that it is in the system, push to know exactly when the file was or will be referred to a judge, as well as asking what timeframes are in place for when you can hear back from the court and take a name. It is important to follow up your conversation with the court by email, as this also provides evidence for you to show your client that you are being proactive” concludes Herbert.

icon

Please login to comment

Zero Deposit Zero Deposit Zero Deposit
sign up