By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Industry rages against Labour’s “laughable” rent control plan

Calls by Labour’s London Mayor Sadiq Khan to secure powers to implement private sector rent controls are facing increasing opposition.

Business organisation London First says such a policy, if ever implemented, would hold back investment in house building.

John Dickie, London First’s director of strategy and policy, says: “The Mayor is right to focus on improvements to the private rented sector as more and more Londoners live in rented homes.


“But the answer to London’s housing crisis lies in redoubling efforts to build more homes, not making it harder, through rent controls, to secure new investment into house building.

“As the Mayor’s proposals acknowledge, Build To Rent must not be held back from delivering high-quality, professionally managed, new homes for Londoners.”

And the Residential Landlords Association’s policy director Dabid Smith says Khan’s calls for powers to implement rent controls are meaningless if Londoners can’t find a home to live in. 

“Rent controls will lead to a drop in investment and increasing supply should be the Mayor’s priority. Localised rent controls would also have a huge impact in the surrounding areas. With demand continuing to outstrip supply, residents would have to move out of the city and rents would be pushed up further as demand increases in the commuter belt” insists Smith.

“Research from the Centre for Cities has found that rent controls divide renters into the privileged and outsiders, with those already renting when the controls are introduced doing well but those hoping to move into the city or for more space losing out, damaging social mobility” he adds.

“London rent rises are already well below inflation increasing at just 0.9 per cent in the year to June compared to the consumer price index rise of 2.0 per cent.”

Lettings guru Marc von Grundherr, director of London agency Benham and Reeves, says the proposal by the capital’s Mayor is little short of idiotic and “demonstrates a real lack of understanding when it comes to the rental sector and wider property market.”

He says: “To further deter landlords from the rental space by restricting the income available, having already hit them where it hurts via a ban on tenant fees, stamp duty hikes, and tax changes, will only see a reduction in stock and further inflame the issues that we are currently seeing. Landlords are the lifeblood of the rental market, they need to be encouraged to remain in the sector, not to exit it.”

And Tom Gatzen, co-founder of PropTech platform ideal flatmate, comments: “A quite frankly laughable proposal from Sadiq Khan and one that reeks of desperation. During his time in power, his severe failure to deliver on the number of new homes promised has contributed massively towards an over-reliance on the London rental sector. This demand has pushed rental prices up further and the capital’s tenants are the ones that have paid the price.”

  • jeremy clarke

    Failed London mayor tries yet another ruse to save his own skin whilst all around him the city is disappearing under a crime wave! The sooner this politically motivated individual goes the better, he hasn't got a clue about life, let's just hope that the voting public see him for what he really is and that he's never allowed near national politics.

    Algarve  Investor

    You really don't think there is a link between massive cuts in police numbers, not to mention the closing down of many youth centres and youth facilities, and years of austerity, and the current problems with knife crime and the like? That's not to excuse the current spate, but these things often have root causes. Glasgow, previously one of the crime capitals of Europe, found those root causes, successfully remedied or stamped them out, and has seen crime fall significantly.

    I'd also be casting an eye at our soon-to-be next PM, whose terrible legacy of failed vanity projects and a massive bill for the Olympics - not to mention a drastic cut in police numbers - have certainly had an impact on London's current issues.


    @Algarve Investor I'd be interested to know why you think cuts in police numbers leads to higher crime? I keep hearing it and there is no evidence to support it whatsoever, so I'd honestly be interested to hear your viewpoint.

  • icon

    Keep it up Labour please. You dont have a cat in hell's chance of ever getting into power, great ideas keep them coming.

  • icon
    • 22 July 2019 16:07 PM

    Knife crime in London is being perpetrated by a certain ethnicity which is mostly concerned with protecting their drug turf.
    As long as drugs are illegal this ethnicity will carry on killing eachother to protect their criminal drug enterprises.
    As long as they don't start killing white members of society who aren't involved in this drug activity that is something that white society is prepared to accept.
    It might be an unpalatabe truth but certain lives DON'T matter.
    Putting more police on the street won't solve a thing as if they try to do their job they are accused of discrimination.
    So why bother!?
    It would make a great deal of sense if drugs were legalised.
    Alcohol and tobacco kill far more than illegal drugs yet they are legal and taxed heavily.
    Decriminalisation of drugs would save billions of pounds per year.
    Police can then get on doing other stuff.
    Personally I really don't care if a druggie kills themselves the same as those who do so with alcohol and tobacco.
    It is their CHOICE!!
    The State will NEVER succeed in preventing that CHOICE so just accept it and legalise.
    That will stop a lot of the knife crime.

  •  G romit

    Dan Wilson-Craw, Generation Rent admits rent have fallen in 'real' terms.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up