By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Rogue tenants can cost £40,000 to £100,000 to evict, warns top agent

Research by London agency Benham and Reeves says the cumulative cost of a landlord suffering a bad tenant and then evicting them could - in extreme - cost no less than £100,000. 

Previous research by the agency highlighted the increasing number of fraudulent lettings applications by rogue tenants, who no longer need pay if their application is denied due to the introduction of the Tenant Fee Act 2019. 

Now it has calculated the detrimental financial impact a rogue tenant can have on a landlord's buy to let investment based on lost rent, the cost of refitting a kitchen and bathroom, redecorating and replacing the windows, the potential legal fees, as well as the additional cost of mortgage payments out of their own pocket while no rent is coming in.


The situation is theoretical but is not impossible, and many landlords have suffered precisely such a ‘perfect storm’.

According to Benham and Reeves, a rogue tenant takes roughly nine months in total to evict from the moment they enter the property to legally removing them. On average across the UK, that’s £6,111 of rent lost. 

If the tenant is particularly bad and the property requires a complete renovation, this could cost £8,000 for a new kitchen, £4,875 for a new bathroom, an additional £2,900 for redecorating, plus £7,000 for new windows. 

Average legal fees of £3,000 would be required during the eviction process, added to which there could be nine months of mortgage payments (£8,412) if there is no rental income. 

This total - already over £40,000 - would in London rise to a likely £58,000 because of higher average costs; exceptionally, in the most expensive boroughs, the total bill for these problems combined could exceed £100,000.



“We’re not kidding when we talk about the complete renovation and refurbishment of the property afterwards either, as [rogue tenants] will take every single thing they can and destroy whatever is left. Kitchens, bathrooms, and windows are often the main features targeted as they know that these are the most costly areas of a property to replace and more often than not they will smash appliances to pieces, disconnect pipping and shatter windows for no other reason than to cause the maximum amount of damage they can” says the director of Benham and Reeves, Marc von Grundherr.

“We can’t stress enough how vital it is to rent via an agent who conducts proper checks through a qualified third party trained to spot even the most convincing of forged documents. Failing to do so can cost you thousands, even hundreds of thousands to put right.”  

  • S l
    • S l
    • 15 August 2019 21:08 PM

    I had just such a tenant and not only the above damages was caused , He left his dirty clothes and ripped couch behind in addition to intercom phone being ripped off, lights bulb taken off and the door had a knife stucked on top of it, not to mention the knife marks with words on the walls and carpets... the list is endless.

  • PossessionFriendUK PossessionFriend

    Shame that society hasn't woken up to the cost of bad tenants.Also, during the time its taking to evict them, that is preventing others deserving of accommodation from housing .
    Lets not mince words, - if as a tenant you disrespect the trust a landlord has placed in you and fail to pay lawful debt or cause damage or disturbance to the community - Those tenants Don't DERSERVE to be housed, in any sector.
    They should swap places with someone living on the street who IS prepared to follow the rules. Everyone has to abide by rules, although the Government has all but made them redundant in Civil ( Housing ) Justice. [sic]

  • Barry X

    And the government listens to Shelter, not us, and has been happy to undermine the vital Section 21 Notice for years to pander to them with all their very anti-landlord policies aimed not at improving anything except their own fund raising ability, and now - disgracefully, and on top of all the other dreadful measures causing serious harm to the private rental sector they claim to understand and care so much about - the government is close to abolishing it altogether!!!

    If it wasn't for capital gains tax (for the properties we have in our own names) and corporation tax (for all our others held in our company) - largely a tax on inflation not profit in the case of long held properties as all of ours are (we haven't bothered investing any more in this sick country for years now)... if it wasn't for that (oh and my cancer and dependence on BUPA to stay alive - THEY have been fantastic by the way, recommended) we would have sold up an gone long ago!!!

    We still might do, even if it costs us 40% for "our" properties and almost 20% for "our companies" plus all the costs and bearing in mind the weakness in the market and fact this is a terrible time to sell... its becoming an even worse time to own and there ARE many other investments that can give better returns for a LOT less risk and hassle.

    We're thinking about it and tempted, believe me.


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up