x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Industry figure claims scrapping S21 isn’t so very bad…

The government should “just get on with implementing the Renters Reform Bill” an industry figure says. 

Jonathan Rolande of the National Association of Property Buyers says the delays surrounding what has proved to be a controversial bill now risk causing long-term damage to the sector.


“The bill is well-intentioned and rightly gives more security to tenants whilst protecting landlords from many of the potential side effects.

Advertisement

“The main fear of many landlords is the removal of Section 21, the notice that is served to obtain possession of the property, once the initial term has expired. 

“Once the bill is in place, possession can only be sought if a person is selling or moving back in. This is something that landlords feel gives them far less say in who lives in their property and has been a contributing factor in many deciding to sell up and exit the sector.”

He insists that the removal of Section 21 will have little or no impact on most landlords. 

“If a tenant is happy and paying rent why issue them notice? If they are misbehaving in a serious way or not paying, a Section 8 still gets the property back” he says.

“The problem here is less the content of the bill and more the perception. Although you’ll be hard-pressed to find many people sympathetic to the average landlord, they have a right to feel that they’ve been under attack of late.”

Urging the government to get on with things he adds: “Hundreds of thousands are contemplating selling up and leaving the sector. With prices usually higher for a vacant home, many tenants may somewhat ironically find Section 21s arriving to beat the ban and allow the property to sell for market value.

“If the Renters Reform Bill is the medicine the market needs, can we just get on with it? The delay and therefore the fear of the unknown is the worst of all worlds. Many happy tenants will lose their homes in this interim period. Once it is in place, we’ll know what we’re dealing with and there’s a good chance it won’t be as dreadful as people think."

  • icon

    Jonathan Rolande, you are an idiot if that is truly what you believe.

  • icon

    Rolande - Is your other name Martyn Gibbons?? the stupidity of your comments matches his usual gibberish

  • icon

    Whilst it's true that most Landlords are not going to get rid of a good tenant, unfortunately there are a lot of bad ones that will soon figure out exactly what they can get away with an still not be able to be kicked out. So in that scenario, not be able to use any of an (unconfirmed) list of reasons means that as the only option left will be to sell, the Landlord will have to, and that's another rental property lost. And another tenant on the list for non-existent council properties.

  • Matthew Payne

    I think reading the bill might be a good start before telling people affected how they should feel about it.

  • icon

    The author of that article writes as if there weren't assured tenancies without section 21 in the past. There were. They were created by the Housing Act 1980. They weren't popular with landlords. That is why shorthold assured tenancies with Section 21 were introduced by the Government in the Housing Act 1988. It was a way of increasing the availability of flats for the ordinary person who wanted to rent one.

    Now the Government appears to have wanted to reduce the number of people letting flats, pushing tenants with jobs on to the property ladder as owner occupiers, and forcing private landlords to let to those who have no chance of getting a mortgage.

    I have no doubt that their plans will not work well, not least because landlords will respond to assured tenancies as they did in 1980 - not many will let that way.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up