x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Government's bold claim - 'Fees Ban won't hurt many agents'

The government has made the controversial claim that the ban on the levying of fees on tenants will not produce “significant adverse effects” on letting agents. 

At the end of a new 55-page document outlining progress on the Tenant Fees Bill through Parliament, published between Christmas and New Year, the government says it will monitor the effects of the measure when it becomes law - this is expected sometime in 2019. 

“Given the number of recent, and planned, policy changes in the private rented sector, we will monitor trends across the industry as a whole, utilising a range of data sources. These include VOA rental prices data, the ONS rental price index, and data from the English Housing Survey” explains the government. 

“The Private Landlord Survey 2018 is currently underway, with findings due to be reported at the end of Summer 2018. This will provide a useful baseline. However, it will not be possible to detect with any level of robustness any change in rental level or landlord behaviour that are attributable solely to the Tenant Fees Bill. For example, any changes in rental price growth could be due to a wide range of factors in the economy” it continues.

Then, controversially, it adds: “We plan to monitor the implications of the Tenant Fees Bill for any adverse impacts through continued engagement with key stakeholder groups representing landlords, agents and tenants as well as wider intelligence from agencies such as the Lead Enforcement Authority and trading standards who will enforce the requirements of the Bill. 

“We expect minimal impact on landlords, given they charge much lower fees as evidenced in responses to the consultation than letting agents. Even with higher levels of pass through, the cost implications on individual landlords are likely to be small. For letting agents, as the ban on letting fees targets profits that would not be earned in an effective and competitive market, we do not anticipate significant adverse effects on letting agents.” 

Earlier in this new document - repeating some of the sentiments included in the impact assessment off the fee ban published earlier this year - the government states: ”The Government’s position is that landlords will cover the costs of contracting an agent and any on-going management that they choose to procure, this will, it is argued ‘sharpen and increase letting agents’ incentives to compete for landlords’ business resulting in a more transparent market with lower overall fees and a higher quality of service.’ It is acknowledged that the ban on fees may have a negative impact on agents that are “unable to adapt to the market.”

The government then repeats another controversial claim - that the full cost of fees currently paid by tenants should not be passed to landlords. The government insists that “there is evidence that a number of agents are charging excessive fees and that some agents are double charging landlords and tenants.”

You can read the latest document in full here - it does not contain any confirmed date when the Bill will be made law, although its final major Parliamentary stage is taken in the House of Lords on January 19.

  • Simon Shinerock

    In other news the Government has released the results of a controversial study finally proving 2+2 does not equal 4 and that black is white and white is black

  • icon

    Cost implications for landlords are likely to be small..... should it not read the cost implications to tenants .....

  • icon

    If they are considering fee ban for agents they should also consider a fee ban on Solicitors so that it lighten the load on first time buyers.
    Who are these preasure groups that keep on putting preasure on the goverment?? Are they on Crack? There is no need for an enforcement agency for the fee ban as there will be no agencies left to monitor. It should be Capped but not banned as every agency's realy work hard to achieve some sort of reward for the amount of crap they have to deal with

    icon

    Your right, but the OPPOSITE is the case - - Legal Aid is set to soar, costing Tax-payers and especially landlords, a lot of money in court proceedings, damages and delayed Possession cases.
    Have a read of the Lead article in today's Property 118 entitled, 'UNFIT - Fitness For Human Habitation Act 2018.

     
  • icon

    Maybe we should all sign a petition for all politicians to work without taking a salary?

  • Angus Shield

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha....sorry; that's the best Christmas Cracker joke I've read this holiday!
    I am sitting here composing a letter to our Landlord Clients apologising for the revised pricing structure effective 1st April along with digesting my extortionate revised Rightmove subscription, budgeting for all of our compliance (Ombudsman, Client Money Protection, Pi & Pl Insurances, etc), the Office rent & SC increase having paid the Corporation Tax, VAT and PAYE and scoping if I can offer the Staff a small pay-rise...........why bother!
    Fortunately Tenant Fees are a very small part of our overall income.
    Also noticed the Shelter adverts over Christmas.... don't get me started on that one!

  • icon

    Government bans tenant fees.
    Agents increase landlord fees.
    Landlords raise the rent to cover losses (some not making very much as it is)
    Tenants end up paying more in the long term.
    Should have regulated how much agents can charge.

  • icon

    But that's so simple it makes 'Sense' - you really not hoping for that from the Gov't were you ?

  • Kristjan Byfield

    Average agency profit is around 15-16% per annum, average letting fee ban revenue impact is (reportedly) around 20+% so I cant see any major impact at all. To be fair guys, it's not like the government have any access to this sort of data and also they have spent so much time and energy visiting agencies up and down the country to understand our industry prior to implementing this and other pieces of legislation that this really is a very concise and accurate position they have taken.

    icon

    What are you on KB?

     
icon

Please login to comment

valpal
submit
sign up