By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Politicians again hurting our industry, say agents and landlords

Agents and landlords have united against what is being seen as the latest attack on the private rental sector by the government.

In May the government said it would cap deposits at six weeks rent but yesterday it reneged on the agreement saying it would be five weeks for annual rentals of under £50,000 and six weeks for above.

The industry is furious.


David Cox, chief executive of ARLA Propertymark, says: “Once again politicians are attacking the industry for their own purposes. Tenancy deposits have worked perfectly well for over a decade, and there is no basis in research that these amendments are necessary. This move will do nothing but push the most vulnerable in our society away from professional landlords and agents, and into the hands of rogue landlords and agents who will exploit them.”

David Smith, policy director at the Residential Landlords Association - which had already voiced its disapproval about the idea when it was suggested last weekend- now says: “In doing a complete about turn on this, it is unfortunately vulnerable and elderly tenants who will suffer, just as ministers stated when they initially approved a six week cap. Those who will now find it more difficult to secure a home to rent will include those on benefits and those who have a pet as a companion.”

He continues: “In May, Ministers argued that a cap of six weeks offered a balance between affordability benefits and financial risk to landlords and providing confidence for them to rent to higher risk tenants. They considered that a five week cap did not offer that protection. Nothing appears to have changed since.”

And Jon Notley, chief executive of the Zero Deposit scheme, adds: "It is not sensible to impose a cap that - after a single month’s rent - leaves landlords with very little protection. The objective in terms of improving tenant affordability is both clear and necessary but there are already services on the market that offer the same protection as a traditional six-week deposit for the landlord at the cost of just one week's rent to the tenant. The rental market needs reform, but not in areas where solutions already exist to address its problems.”


The only support for the initiative appears to be from an online lettings agency.

James Davis, founder of Upad, says: “The industry may well respond negatively to this afternoon’s announcement and suggest that landlords will simply increase rents to compensate for what they lose in deposits, but this is somewhat short-sighted as in all reality, it’s not going to change things that much.

Yesterday’s U-turn came in the form of an amendment to the Tenant Fees Bill.

Other amendments to the Bill include protecting tenants from fees by limiting the type of default fees that can be charged by landlords and property agents.

This change means that during the tenancy landlords and agents will only be able to charge fees to replace lost keys or for late rent. Landlords will still be able to claim back costs for damage through the tenancy deposit at the end of the tenancy.

  • James B

    Nothing more than government campaigning for generation rent votes .. no DSS no pets, and any high risk tenants need a homeowner guarantor.. more pain for tenants

  • dale james

    Has anyone read 'Atlas Shrugged' by Ayn Rand? A novel written in the 50's about government meddling in business ........

  • icon

    The fact it is based on weeks when the industry works on a monthly basis tells you all you need to know about this decision.

  • icon

    Great to see Upads commentary being anti agent and where else would you expect to see Upad but on letting agent today when they are not a letting agent!?

  • S l
    • S l
    • 05 December 2018 11:30 AM

    This 5 weeks rent does not in any way address the issue of rogue tenants non payment of rent n huge costs of damages to properties. Landlord n agents should join forces n fight for easier n faster eviction of rogue tenants instead of s21 , the 2 months rents arrears should now read 2 weeks rent arrears to claim possessions. Charging Late fees does not solve problems of non payment of rent n damages as these tenants have no intention to pay n ran off. The politicians in promoting these rules on low deposit must be required to come up with counter rules to solve problems they created


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up