x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button
S l
S l
private landlady
889  Profile Views

About Me

experience in private rental

my expertise in the industry

experience private rental

S's Recent Activity

S l

From: S l 09 September 2019 12:17 PM

S l

From: S l 08 July 2019 12:55 PM

S l
How typical of citizen advice bureau to make statements they have no clue about. Firstly, mould issues tend to be a lifestyle issues. Tenant not ventilating property and rooms despite airing tons of clothes or cooking or showers and refusal to switch on heating to dry the house to save money. Yet this problems falls on landlord as scapegoat. Smoke alarms are a requirement of licencing and its the eho officer to give notice improvement to have wired smoke alarm but then it also do need to change battery which is on the tenants same as changing light bulbs.Why am i not surprise major disrepair NOT caused by TENANTS?? Who ever heard of a tenant admitting liability? ever???? I had tenants who had parties and ripped the stairway bannister right off the wall with 3 big holes on the plaster and the bathroom sink left hanging off the wall with floor boards broke in half and its not their fault. Claimed its old house and its falling apart. Disrepair major threat to their health and safety-yeah whose lifestyle was it? cant blame landlord if they trash the place and not keep it clean and tidy and ventilate when new upvc windows got locks to allow small gaps. Wonder where they get their numbers from considering that all the points are dealt with at licencing and checks by eho officer with requirement for gas and electricity certificate. Where did this cab come from ? they are completely clueless. Well 900k is rather far fetch dont you think? somebody needs to take CA to task and if found deliberately lying , should be sued!!! Well, if there is a national body to do the work, should pull off grant from the EHO department in the council and cut down jobs as the CA in a way is saying the EHO are useless and not doing their job which i tend to disagree. another gimmick from CA to get headlines?

From: S l 27 June 2019 09:31 AM

S l

From: S l 25 June 2019 08:32 AM

S l

From: S l 21 June 2019 17:49 PM

S l

From: S l 14 June 2019 08:34 AM

S l
unfortunately, the neighbours dont like non white living amongst them let alone let the rooms out. They had contacted the council and the council stop by unannounced and talked to the students who apparently didnt tell them anything. When landlord got a letter, he was a little confused until the council came and start asking everyone questions including the non legitimate lodgers who are there which the landlord did not know about and when asked to leave they refused!! very strange people think they can stay there without the landlord consent just because they know the landlord dont have time and wont be there monday -friday and most weekends when he have to work overtime. In SW, one are required to have hmo licence if more than 3 unrelated individual of more than 2 household. you can check the BANES website but cant challenge them or will incur the wrath of the eho. They even went on to issued a letter for attending interview under caution , same powers exercise by the police! If you refused to attend, they will inform the court who will use it against the landlord. If you do attend, they will ask questions and will use your answers to twist it to suit their case against the landlord. So its a lose lose situation for any landlord and especially ones with lodgers without any legal knowledge as to how he would be sued and end up with a criminal record. Legal fees would go up to the thousands just to get them to attend with the landlords. even then , the lawyer does nothing to defend the landlord or advice how to defend himself. I would say that these other people are intruders and not his lodgers and have no contractual relationship with him and go from there. considering that he is not in most of the time, his lodgers took advantage of his situation and created a hmo which should not be used against him. But the EHO do not care, they thought they caught him red handed and use duress to get a signed confession. How wrong is that. How should i advise the landlord? at least to get back the signed confession under duress back from the council to stop it being used in court in the future against the landlord

From: S l 06 June 2019 10:41 AM

S l

From: S l 03 June 2019 09:53 AM

S l

From: S l 10 May 2019 10:40 AM

S l

From: S l 30 April 2019 10:28 AM

S l

From: S l 29 April 2019 22:39 PM

S l

From: S l 08 April 2019 12:29 PM

S l

From: S l 22 March 2019 12:26 PM

S l

From: S l 16 March 2019 15:02 PM

S l

From: S l 15 March 2019 10:20 AM

S l

From: S l 15 February 2019 13:21 PM

S l

From: S l 30 January 2019 20:34 PM

S l
fraud? criminal? all i can see is his lying about his payslip and job. so that makes it criminal. not to forget, it should be the mortgage company who check the payslip, why is it the lawyers responsiblity? the mortgage company approved the mortgage, bear in mind in those years,its self certification and dont even need anything to prove ability to pay. just like the credit cards etc. so why are the conveyancer being charge? perhaps when it gets to be that high, he probably thought he hit the jackpot and trying to survive on a sole man company with no network no business. it is a shame that he didnt wake up when he is dealing with such a high volume from one individuals, that would make him negligent i gather but criminally wrong? can anyone explain. also why is conveyancer being punish higher than the criminal himself? also bear in mind magistrates does not have legal background and thats probably why increasing number of innocent people are found guilty. they tend to favour the ones in uniform or in organisation. we need legally qualified personal to sit on the judges benches and to have no part in politics. its about justice and impose sentences equal to the crime and as a deterrent, we have too many people sitting on their high horses demanding attention that they have the power and not afraid to use it. with higher powers come higher responsibility not to abuse it especially with so many of us innocent ones but deem to be guilty if they are not going to give extension of time to do an improvement making us at their mercy and the mercy of unscrupulous tradesman who have no qualm about charging double high prices to get job done.

From: S l 08 January 2019 12:09 PM

S l

From: S l 15 December 2018 09:19 AM

S l

From: S l 15 December 2018 09:18 AM

S l

From: S l 13 December 2018 22:16 PM

S l

From: S l 07 December 2018 11:48 AM

S l
There are a lot of reasons why prs do not want those on benefits. yes riskier in terms of non payment, damages, not looking after property despite having LA imposing notices to upgrade the house at our costs without any grant. hence the hike in rental prices. it never use to be this high until the government decided to have a hand in how we manage the letting. with more requirement that costs, the higher the rent. they cant cap rent and expect higher standards and regulations that cost money. If you want to stay in 5 star hotels, you pay 5 star prices. The biggest problems of non payment of rental is that when tenant tried to get into property, they agreed and signed form for the housing benefit to go to landlord. once they moved in, they then have the liberty to change and refuse the housing benefit to be paid to landlord and to be paid directly to themselves and spent it all and not pay rent. no amount of complaint to the benefit office would do any good because we were told that its the right of the person to decide where his housing benefit are paid into and its not their problems that it wasnt paid to landlords. so yes to the above, no s21, no definite direct payment to landlord for rent, no thank you to the social tenants that the government are suppose to house and shelter instead of looking at prs. They create a mess for the tenant, how is that to increase their votes? shouldnt they offer a rogue tenant list for us landlord in order to be fair and if landlord are to be strip off their licence to rent for being rogue, shouldnt rogue tenants not be allow to rent too?

From: S l 03 December 2018 09:38 AM

S l

From: S l 26 September 2018 07:03 AM

Zero Deposit Zero Deposit Zero Deposit