By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Compulsory independent inventory petition to MPs nears 1,000 signature mark

An online petition urging MPs to make it compulsory for privately let properties to be subject to independent inventory reporting is nearing the 1,000 signature mark.

The petition has been lodged on the official parliamentary website by Danny Zane, joint chair of the Association of Independent Inventory Clerks, which is campaigning for greater regulation on the issue. 

The petition cites a survey by interiors firm Hillarys which suggests that of 2,500 tenants questioned, one third admitted having their deposit withheld and 68 per cent believed their landlord didn’t provide good enough reason for doing so. 


It also quotes a claim by personal finance website Money that 40 per cent of students lose well over a third of their deposit when they rent privately, while 79 per cent do not sign a photo inventory when they move in.

“Please support this petition and help us make the letting process more transparent for all” says Zane, who has previously appealed to agents and landlords to back the call.

The petition is available online until April 30; if it secures 10,000 signatures it will trigger an official government response, typically in the form of a letter from a minister, while if it secures 100,000 signatures it will probably lead to a debate on the issue amongst MPs. 

Those signing the petition are also invited to participate in the current investigations into the private rental sector and so-called ‘rogue landlords’ being carried out by the Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee.

These MPs - whose deliberations have been reported in Letting Agent Today in recent weeks - are looking at, amongst other things, how letting agents have dealt with any complaints lodged by tenants, the support to private tenants coming from councils, and a call for suggestions for greater protection for renters against unreasonable landlords.

  • Fed Up Landlord

    A blatant attempt at protectionism by the AIIC which is destined to fail. All this will do is alienate it against letting agents and landlords who will be less likely to use oursourced inventory providers and bring it in house due to the impending tenant fee ban. That's what it's all about. So the AIIC have dressed it up as
    " independent" inventory compilation. There is a ckear inference that agents are not competent and cannot be trusted. So let's make the whole letting process
    " independent" then. An "independent" agent who lists the property; one who does the let for the landlord; another who deals with the tenant. That would work really well. I don't think.

  • icon

    We do our own inventories and we have been told time and time again by both landlords and tenants that ours is the most explicit inventory they have received, I have looked at out sourcing but cannot find one to compare


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up