x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
STAY CONNECTED!
    
newsletter-button
jeremy clarke
jeremy clarke
Director
5228  Profile Views

About Me

Over 30 years as an agent

my expertise in the industry

managed large chain flagship office and now run my own business

jeremy's Recent Activity

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 29 August 2019 08:17 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 18 April 2019 08:14 AM

jeremy clarke
The headline was banning S21, the issue is not so much to do with S21 more to do with S8. Very few landlords use the S21 for a no fault eviction process, most use S21 for other reasons such as rent arrears breach of tenancy because the S8 process is not fit for purpose. S8 is rife with pitfalls, loopholes and opportunities for the tenants that know the system (& "charities") to exploit. Delays cost landlords money and there is often no recourse on the offending tenants so landlords take a view that at least S21 gives them certainty; they write off any tenant debts just to get the property back. S21 & S8 do not need 'tinkering with', they need a total review! A landlord must be able to get the property back either when the landlord wants it (sale, move in, for relative etc) but also when tenant defaults. Any new S8 grounds must be able to be actioned quickly to prevent huge losses to the landlord, say within 14 days for rent arrears?(After June 1st, landlords become the cheapest way for tenants to borrow money, a tenant with a rent of say £1,000 pcm can only be charged interest on the debt at 3% above base rate after 14 days - effectively 10p a day! Where else can you borrow money at those rates?) In addition, when the tenants owe the landlord money for rent, repairs etc. the tenant must immediately, without any further court action receive a County Court Judgement for the debt; if the tenant owes rent they must not be given Carte Blanc to go and do it again to another landlord. A central register which can be accessed by landlords and agents which shows all offending tenants must be produced. In my opinion, if a tenant discovers that he/she/they are going to get a CCJ, it will focus their minds and moderate their behaviour. So, this means radical changes to the court system with accessible court time for landlords and penalties on the system if it cannot perform; if the courts had to say, pay the landlords' rent and costs for any delayed time then landlords might not mind waiting. At the moment the biggest issue with landlords taking tenants to court via S8 is the uncertainty and the time delay - RESOLVE THAT FIRST BEFORE EVEN TALKING ABOUT BANNING S21!

From: jeremy clarke 16 April 2019 11:19 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 08 March 2019 07:39 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 26 February 2019 11:05 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 08 February 2019 07:59 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 04 January 2019 08:00 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 13 December 2018 08:11 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 26 November 2018 08:21 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 13 September 2018 14:19 PM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 15 June 2018 08:35 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 23 May 2018 07:46 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 30 November 2017 08:11 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 20 September 2017 08:33 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 09 August 2017 08:08 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 06 July 2017 14:15 PM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 28 April 2017 08:00 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 25 April 2017 14:59 PM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 22 December 2016 12:30 PM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 07 October 2016 09:58 AM

jeremy clarke
We need to do something but this headlong rush into banning fees is wrong. When you see all the protesters on their marches most look like tree hugging hippies and as we saw with the recent Gatwick protests many were over-privileged hired hands making a load noise as they have nothing better to do. I have been running an agency for 15 years and have never had a tenant object to paying a fee nor lost a tenancy because of tenants' fees which makes me think that the "noise" is being made by the few rather than the majority. What these groups seem to focus on is that they can get free credit checks done or at least at a minimal cost; that is of course only part of the whole picture when it comes to referencing, we deal with past landlords, employers council tax register et al. Moving the charges to the landlord is all well and good but where do you draw the line, tenants must accept some responsibility for their actions? As an example last week we showed 3 couples around a flat, they all (at the viewing) "wanted it" as there was little to choose between any of them and we always discuss with our landlords we advised all viewers that we would come back to them later in the day after speaking with the landlord. 1 1/2 hours later having spoken with the landlord we phoned his preferred choice - message left on a mobile, before close of play we feared the worst having not heard back and therefore went to option 2 who had "changed their minds" onto option 3 who had "changed their minds" leaving us with NOTHING and a disappointed landlord (incidentally 9 days later and the first couple haven't even had the courtesy to call us back!) Had we taken a fee on the day I'm certain the outcome would have been different. Capping is all well and good but at what level, I would suggest that we start to put some figures out there to see what the "affected" feel is a reasonable fee level - even though we already publish fees so everyone knows what is what!

From: jeremy clarke 23 September 2016 09:52 AM

jeremy clarke

From: jeremy clarke 20 July 2016 09:34 AM

Zero Deposit Zero Deposit Zero Deposit